2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solution of the bond behavior of FRCM composites using a rigid-softening cohesive material law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A trilinear CML was employed to study the bond behavior of PBO-concrete joints and allowed for an accurate modeling of the corresponding load response [39]. Simpler CML were also employed (e.g., bilinear elasto-fragile [40] or rigid-softening [41]). Although these CML can be easily calibrated, their simple shape entails for less accurate load responses with respect to those obtained with a trilinear CML.…”
Section: Analytical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A trilinear CML was employed to study the bond behavior of PBO-concrete joints and allowed for an accurate modeling of the corresponding load response [39]. Simpler CML were also employed (e.g., bilinear elasto-fragile [40] or rigid-softening [41]). Although these CML can be easily calibrated, their simple shape entails for less accurate load responses with respect to those obtained with a trilinear CML.…”
Section: Analytical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is caused by the experimental test control mode, which enforced a monotonical increase of global slip during the entire tests. Further details regarding the occurrence of snap-back in analytical and experimental FRP-substrate and FRCM-substrate joints can be found in [41,47]. Figure 14.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Load Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further increase of the machine stroke after σ* determined a reduction of the applied load with increasing global slip at the FDS, whereas the slip at the loaded end of the PDS (not shown in Figure 4b) remained approximately constant or slightly decreased, probably due to the recovery of the elastic deformation of the fibers. The applied stress eventually plateaued at a value σ f associated with the presence of friction at the matrix-fiber interface [23,52] on the FDS. For specimen MB_300_60_B_3, the applied friction stress at the completion of the test was lower than that of specimens MB_300_60_B_1 and 2 (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Quasi-static Monotonic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak and friction stresses of all quasi-static monotonic tests are reported in Table 3 together with their average values for the three specimens and corresponding coefficient of variation (CoV). Following the procedure proposed in [23,52,53], σ f was computed as the average of the applied stress within the range of g where the first derivative of σ(g) with respect to g was within (−200,0). This range is highlighted in Figure 4b at the tail of each curve.…”
Section: Quasi-static Monotonic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on several parameters, such as the matrix and textile type and layout and the properties of substrate and matrix, debonding may occur at different interfaces [23]. For FRCM that feature fibers that are not coated (i.e., not impregnated/sized with organic resin), debonding at the matrix-fiber interface has been frequently reported [24][25][26][27]. In the case of SRG composites, the debonding of the external matrix layer (that covers the fibers) together with the fibers from the internal layer (bonded to the substrate), referred to as matrix interlaminar failure, has been often observed [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%