2008
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/063011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solution of the voter model on uncorrelated networks

Abstract: We present a mathematical description of the voter model dynamics on heterogeneous networks. When the average degree of the graph is µ ≤ 2 the system reaches complete order exponentially fast. For µ > 2, a finite system falls, before it fully orders, in a quasistationary state in which the average density of active links (links between opposite-state nodes) in surviving runs is constant and equal to (µ−2) 3(µ−1) , while an infinite large system stays ad infinitum in a partially ordered stationary active state.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
313
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
15
313
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The system dynamics is traced in form of an aggregate order parameter and the system is reformulated on the macro-scale as a differential equation which describes the temporal evolution of that parameter. In many cases, the average opinion (due to the analogy to spin systems often called »magnetization«) has proven to be an adequate choice, but sometimes the number of (re)active interfaces yields a more handable transformation (e.g., Frachebourg and Krapivsky, 1996;Krapivsky and Redner, 2003;Vazquez and Eguíluz, 2008). A mean-field analysis for the VM on the complete graph was presented by Slanina and Lavicka (2003), and naturally, we come across the same results using our method (Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system dynamics is traced in form of an aggregate order parameter and the system is reformulated on the macro-scale as a differential equation which describes the temporal evolution of that parameter. In many cases, the average opinion (due to the analogy to spin systems often called »magnetization«) has proven to be an adequate choice, but sometimes the number of (re)active interfaces yields a more handable transformation (e.g., Frachebourg and Krapivsky, 1996;Krapivsky and Redner, 2003;Vazquez and Eguíluz, 2008). A mean-field analysis for the VM on the complete graph was presented by Slanina and Lavicka (2003), and naturally, we come across the same results using our method (Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Slanina and Lavicka (2003) derive expressions for the asymptotic exit probabilities and the mean time needed to converge, but the partial differential equations that describe the full probability distribution for the time to reach the stationary state is too difficult to be solved analytically (Slanina and Lavicka, 2003, 4). Further analytical results have been obtained for the VM on d-dimensional lattices (Cox, 1989;Frachebourg and Krapivsky, 1996;Liggett, 1999;Krapivsky and Redner, 2003) as well as for networks with uncorrelated degree distributions (Sood and Redner, 2005;Vazquez and Eguíluz, 2008). It is noteworthy, that the analysis of the VM (and more generally, of binary-state dynamics) on networks has inspired a series of solution techniques such as refined mean-field descriptions (e.g., Sood and Redner, 2005;Moretti et al, 2012), pairwise approximation (e.g., De Oliveira et al, 1993;Vazquez and Eguíluz, 2008;Schweitzer and Behera, 2008;Pugliese and Castellano, 2009) and approximate master equations (e.g., Gleeson, 2011Gleeson, , 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that each individual interacts with people living in her own location (family, friends, neighbors) with a probability α, while with probability 1 − α she does so with individuals of her work place. Once an individual interacts with others, its opinion is updated following a noisy voter model [6,7,8,9,10]: an interaction partner is chosen and the original agent copies her opinion imperfectly (with a certain probability of making mistakes). A more detailed description of the SIRM model can be found in [26].…”
Section: Model Definition and Analytical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragmentation transitions have been frequently observed in simulations [73,100,101,105]. However, common analytical approaches that faithfully capture other phase transitions [72,81,84] yield only rough approximations for the fragmentation threshold [114,115]. In this chapter we present a novel approach, which allows for a precise analytical estimation of fragmentation thresholds.…”
Section: Fragmentation Transitions In Models For Opinion Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%