2009
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solution to the transient phase of steady‐state free precession sequences

Abstract: The transient phase of short-TR steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequences exhibits an often striking complexity and is not only important for nonequilibrium applications (e.g., rapid T 1 -measurements), but can also cause severe artifacts in conventional imaging. In both cases, balanced SSFP sequences are practically (with regard to preparation efficiency) and conceptually (concerning the theoretical understanding of the decay) easier to handle their unbalanced counterparts, for which currently no theory i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using analogy with the effective field in the spin-lock experiment, proven earlier, the two relaxation components are: R1ρ=cos2false(normalΘfalse)R1+sin2false(normalΘfalse)R2 R2ρ=sin2false(normalΘfalse)R1+cos2false(normalΘfalse)R2 These expressions are in agreement with the relaxation expressions in bSSFP derived in Ref. [24]. Using these two relaxation components the steady-state magnetization becomes: Mss=DΛ1D1R1M0 where D is the diagonalization matrix of the H eff and is given in Appendix B.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Using analogy with the effective field in the spin-lock experiment, proven earlier, the two relaxation components are: R1ρ=cos2false(normalΘfalse)R1+sin2false(normalΘfalse)R2 R2ρ=sin2false(normalΘfalse)R1+cos2false(normalΘfalse)R2 These expressions are in agreement with the relaxation expressions in bSSFP derived in Ref. [24]. Using these two relaxation components the steady-state magnetization becomes: Mss=DΛ1D1R1M0 where D is the diagonalization matrix of the H eff and is given in Appendix B.…”
Section: Theorysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The novel non-equilibrium B 1 mapping method (16) makes use of a recently observed linear relation between the frequency of oscillations in the transient phase of unbalanced steady-state free precession sequences and the actual flip angle (17). For sufficient repetitive deviation from steady state in the dynamic 3D acquisitions (matrix, 64 · 52 · 4; isotropic resolution, 5 mm), software triggering (period, 500 ms) was applied to alternate trains of steady-state free precession blocks (57 Cine phases) with idle periods.…”
Section: Mr Radiofrequency Field Homogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbol “” signifies the Hermitian conjugate of vectors and matrices. The similarity transformation matrices are defined as S=true(1+i01i0001true) boldS1=12true[110i+i0002true]. In some situations, such as in the investigation of transient phase behavior of steady state sequences as performed by Ganter , the unitary transformation in Eqs. and may be more convenient; however, its disadvantage is that the scaling factor ρ=1/2 occurs in some components of all further vectors and operator matrices.…”
Section: The Main Challenge: Understanding Echo Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key concept of configuration states was previously based on the Fourier decomposition of transverse magnetization. Now, the full complex system of reference [M + , M − , M z ] T is expressed by means of Fourier decompositions and transforms : lefttrueF˜+(boldk)=V(Mx(boldr)+iMy(boldr)) eikr d3r=VM+(boldr) eikr d3r Mx(boldr)+iMy(boldr)=M+(boldr)=VtrueF˜+(boldk) eikrd3k, lefttrueF˜(boldk)=V(Mx(boldr)iMy(boldr)) eikr d3r=VM(boldr) eikr d3r Mx(boldr)iMy(boldr)=M(boldr)=VtrueF˜(boldk) eikrd3k, …”
Section: The Main Challenge: Understanding Echo Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%