2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solutions to sampling effects in drop size distribution measurements during stationary rainfall: Estimation of bulk rainfall variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may slightly influence the statistics of the measured DSDs. However, Uijlenhoet (1999) has shown that the distribution of rainfall intensities derived from the disdrometer closely follows the climatological distribution for the Netherlands. The small sampling area (20 cm 2 ) may also influence these statistics, as the measurement time interval should be rather large to collect enough drops.…”
Section: ) the De Bilt Filter Paper Datasetmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may slightly influence the statistics of the measured DSDs. However, Uijlenhoet (1999) has shown that the distribution of rainfall intensities derived from the disdrometer closely follows the climatological distribution for the Netherlands. The small sampling area (20 cm 2 ) may also influence these statistics, as the measurement time interval should be rather large to collect enough drops.…”
Section: ) the De Bilt Filter Paper Datasetmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We have used two separate datasets for this to ensure that the retrieval relations used are independent of the data to which they are applied. Because of the (usually) limited sampling area or volume, obtaining statistically robust measurements of DSDs is a challenge (e.g., Tokay et al 2005;Uijlenhoet et al 2006). Despite these limitations, measurements made by disdrometers are still valuable and will be used here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of particles Np i,tot in a particular size bin observed arriving in the disdrometer sample volume at a particular instant is typically taken to be a random deviate (Joss and Waldvogel, 1969) and contributes to sampling uncertainty in the calculated size distribution values. For rainfall, the number of particles observed in a given size bin by a volume sampling device like the SVI is often taken to be a Poisson-distributed random variable (Joss and Waldvogel, 1969;Gertzman and Atlas, 1977;Uijlenhoet et al, 2006). The same approach is taken here for snowfall, considering it to behave as a homogeneous Poisson process during the sampling time interval.…”
Section: B2 Sampling Uncertainties For D Svifi and N D Svifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed particles sizes D ij also vary and are distributed according to a probability density function defined by the size distribution (Uijlenhoet et al, 2006). The observed D ij form a sequence of random variables taken to be independent and identically distributed.…”
Section: B2 Sampling Uncertainties For D Svifi and N D Svifimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation