2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(01)00207-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical structures and analysis of fuzzy PD controllers with multifuzzy sets having variable cross-point level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, Fuzzy Logic Assessment (FLA) [65], which is a scientific approach where uncertainties in judgment are covered for all possible distributions [66], was used to eliminate the possibility of the scenic value assessor (who ticks one box for each parameter of the checklist- Table 2) and FLA overcomes the problem of the wrong attribute being selected and placed in the checklist box, i.e., a cliff slope being recorded in the < 45 • box, when in fact it was c. 70 • (see corrections coefficients in Table 2). It is extremely unlikely that a jump of two attributes would take place.…”
Section: Methodology Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, Fuzzy Logic Assessment (FLA) [65], which is a scientific approach where uncertainties in judgment are covered for all possible distributions [66], was used to eliminate the possibility of the scenic value assessor (who ticks one box for each parameter of the checklist- Table 2) and FLA overcomes the problem of the wrong attribute being selected and placed in the checklist box, i.e., a cliff slope being recorded in the < 45 • box, when in fact it was c. 70 • (see corrections coefficients in Table 2). It is extremely unlikely that a jump of two attributes would take place.…”
Section: Methodology Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 26 parameters were then assessed by a further group of beach users (>500 enquires carried out in the above-mentioned countries) to determine their relative importance, i.e., all parameters are NOT equal, some being more important than others. Further, to limit errors linked to subjective pronouncements and uncertainties inherited in assessment parameters, a Fuzzy Logic Assessment (FLA) [34] approach was used [16]. FLA represents a mathematical, analytical tool used when the complexity of the process in question is very high and there are no precise mathematical models to solve it, such as for highly non-linear processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is given by the expression Table 4 gives the outcome of T-norm operator for rule antecedent, defined in Eqn (31) and Eqn (32) for i th rule, has explained each such individual contribution represents the value of the output variable as computed by a single rule. In this, first the degree of match between the crisp inputs and fuzzy sets describing the meaning of the rule antecedent is computed for each rule using the triangular norm (T-norm): intersection or algebraic product as follows: control decision due to different implication methods and area of the clipped output fuzzy set 3,4 . Once the correction factor (output) is determined then actual B-matrix elements under surface fault condition are determined and subsequently new control gain is determined by another fuzzy module.…”
Section: Drastic Intersection Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy logic is a nonmodel-based technique which deals with knowledge of process behaviour and experience of people working with the process and it can handle non-crisp and incomplete information. Since the first successful application of the idea of fuzzy sets of Zadeh to the control of a dynamic plant by Mamdani and Assilian Fuzzy control Systems Engineering has gained worldwide interest 3,4 . It is possible to control many complex systems effectively by experienced human operators who have no knowledge of their underlying dynamics, while it is difficult to achieve the same with conventional controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%