2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2003.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical study of the effect of wave number on the performance of local absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ka = 0.01 there is several orders of magnitude difference in the error. In three dimensions the approximation to DtN and the BGT boundary conditions are identical [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For ka = 0.01 there is several orders of magnitude difference in the error. In three dimensions the approximation to DtN and the BGT boundary conditions are identical [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thompson and Pinsky [19] and later Harari and Djellouli [20] have shown that through second order these are identical to the BGT far field boundary conditions (30).…”
Section: Two-dimensional Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, this result provides practitioners with the needed confidence to employ the proposed boundary condition on artificial boundaries that are "close" to the considered scatterer's boundary, leading therefore to small computational domains. Note that the situation is not the same in the case of the standard DtN2/BGT2 boundary conditions (recall that in 3D, the standard DtN2 and BGT2 conditions coincide [11]). More specifically, in the high-frequency regime, the high-order spurious modes (whether they are propagating, evanescent, or grazing modes) created by the standard BGT2/DtN2 boundary condition do not decay, as observed in [2], requiring therefore to place the artificial boundary very far from the obstacle to avoid the deterioration of the accuracy level due to the possible contamination of these non physical modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%