2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical techniques combined with chemometrics for authentication and determination of contaminants in condiments: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, an analytical fingerprint is much harder to intentionally manipulate by a fraudster than just a limited number of specific markers. Examples of such analytical fingerprinting approaches include the discrimination of organic from conventional produce (eggs, , meat (Ballin, 2010;Sentandreu and Sentandreu, 2014)), various geographical origin issues (Cubero-Leon et al, 2014), processing conditions (virgin status of olive oil (Dais and Hatzakis, 2013)), product origin (wild/farmed fish (Arechavala-Lopez et al, 2013)), speciality production (GTS, Leidse kaas: (Galle et al, 2011)) or biological origin or adulteration (Reinholds et al, 2015). All these applications have in common that they use some form of 'conventional' methodology (for food/feed predominantly analytical chemistry) to produce an analytical fingerprint, or chemical or physical profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, an analytical fingerprint is much harder to intentionally manipulate by a fraudster than just a limited number of specific markers. Examples of such analytical fingerprinting approaches include the discrimination of organic from conventional produce (eggs, , meat (Ballin, 2010;Sentandreu and Sentandreu, 2014)), various geographical origin issues (Cubero-Leon et al, 2014), processing conditions (virgin status of olive oil (Dais and Hatzakis, 2013)), product origin (wild/farmed fish (Arechavala-Lopez et al, 2013)), speciality production (GTS, Leidse kaas: (Galle et al, 2011)) or biological origin or adulteration (Reinholds et al, 2015). All these applications have in common that they use some form of 'conventional' methodology (for food/feed predominantly analytical chemistry) to produce an analytical fingerprint, or chemical or physical profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new object x belongs to a class which encompasses most of the k empirically chosen neighbors. An increase in the value of k reduces the impact of errors, whereas its decrease worsens classification (Pérez‐Caballero et al., ; Reinholds, Bartkevics, Silvis, van Ruth, & Esslinger, ). This value is related to the number of neighbors (“votes”) to poll for future classifications, such that k = 1 provides a good classification rule.…”
Section: Chemometrics In Food‐related Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the commercialization of defatted paprika as integral paprika (with all its components) (ASTA, ). On the other hand, it can be added “extenders,” which are parts of the same plant added in the spices to gain weight or increase the volume (Galvin‐King et al., ; Reinholds, Bartkevics, Silvis, van Ruth, & Esslinger, ). For example, the addition of nonspice vegetable matters like stamens and safflower in pure saffron (Petrakis & Polissiou, ).…”
Section: Herbs and Spices: Common Adulterants And Geographical Originmentioning
confidence: 99%