Analytical units in federal and provincial governments: origins, functions and suggestions for effectiveness

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of the organizational entities (individuals and groups) within government which provide information, analysis, and advice to senior officials and politicians. These entities are referred to as analytical units. Much of the existing Canadian literature on such units has focused on policy units and evaluation units at the federal level. This paper extends the analysis to the provincial level and to a wider range of analytical activities. A major focus of this paper is on social policy ministries at the federal and provincial levels. A historical overview of the development of analytical units, based on the existing literature, is presented. As little has been written about these units in Canada since the early 1980s, the authors provide an update to the 1990s and project some possible future trends. The reasons for the development of analytical units are presented along with a discussion of their structural location and how they function within their host organizations. A considerable overlap exists in the analytical functions carried out by these units. A mapping of this overlap is presented and discussed. There appears to be a clustering of analytical activities into a three‐part continuum of: forward‐looking activities such as policy formulation/analysis and planning; ongoing activities to ensure organizational efficiency and effectiveness such as internal audit and operational review; and technical and evaluative activities such as research and evaluation. Based on their analysis, the authors present five suggestions regarding how staff in analytical units may be able to increase their contribution to their organizations and five suggestions, for the consideration of senior officials, regarding how they may be able to enhance the quality of the analysis they receive from their analytical units. Sommaire: Cet article présente un aperçu des entités organisationnelles (personnes ou groupes) situées au sein du gouvernement et fournissant renseignements, analyse et conseils aux hauts fonctionnaires et aux politiciens. On donne ici à ces entités le nom d» unités d'analyse «. Une forte proportion des articles et études existant au Canada à leur sujet porte sur les unités de politiques et les unités d'évaluation à l'échelon fédéral. Le présent article étend la portée de cette littéature à l'échelon provincial ainsi quà une gamme plus vaste d'activités d'analyse. Il présente un aperçu historique du développement de ces unités, basé sur la littérature existante. Puisque trés peu a étéécrit sur ce sujet au Canada depuis le début des années 1980, les auteurs offrent une mise à jour allant jusquaux années 1990 et présentent une projection de tendances futures possibles. Ils expliquent les raisons justifiant le développement de ces unités et examinent leur place ainsi que leur mode de fonctionnement au sein des organismes hôtes. Il y a un chevauchement considérable des fonctions analytiques exécutées par ces unités. Les auteurs délimitent ce chevauchement et l'examinent de plus pré...

Transnational learning, policy analytical capacity, and environmental policy convergence: Survey results from Canada

“…In the U.K. and Germany, for example, contrary to the picture of carefully recruited analysts trained in policy schools to undertake specific types of microeconomicinspired policy analysis (Weimer and Vining, 1999), investigators such as Page and Jenkins (2005) and Fleischer (2009) have provided some empirical evidence that British and German policymaking typically features a group of ''policy process generalists'' who rarely, if ever, deal with policy matters in the substantive areas in which they were trained and who have, in fact, very little training in formal policy analysis. 3 Studies of policy analysts in federal countries have echoed these results but have traditionally focused almost exclusively at the central level (Voyer, 2007;Prince, 1979;Prince and Chenier, 1980;Hollander and Prince, 1993) despite the fact that sub-national governments in many such countries often control important areas of social, economic, and political life, including that of the environment (Voyer, 2007;Wellstead et al, 2007). Information on analytical activities and the supply of policy advice at this level remains extremely rudimentary, often generated or collected from personal reflections and anecdotes of former analysts and managers, or from a small number of single-government interviews or surveys (McArthur, 2007;Rasmussen, 1999;Singleton, 2001;Hicks and Watson, 2007;Policy Excellence Initiative, 2007).…”

Policy Analysis and Governance: Analytical and Policy Styles in Canada

“…In some cases, departments will have corporate policy shops and others attached to specific program areas, and even the smallest departments may have dedicated policy research capabilities (Hollander and Prince 1993). However, since all ministers and deputy ministers are appointed directly by the prime minister and premiers (in some provinces, they also appoint assistant deputy ministers), policy analysis in Canadian governments, no matter how professional and nonpartisan the public service in question, tends to lack independence.…”

Increasing capacity for knowledge translation: understanding how some researchers engage policy makers

“…Research is a broad category, encompassing such things as surveys, evaluations, or needs assessments. Hollander and Prince (1993) studied the analytic functions carried out by in-house government groups providing research information. They categorized input to policy-making as falling on a continuum of: forward-looking activities (policy formulation/analysis and planning); ongoing activities for organizational maintenance (internal audit, operational review); and technical and evaluative activities (research, evaluation).…”