2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical validation of GenoPharm a clinical genotyping open array panel of 46 pharmacogenes inclusive of variants unique to people of African ancestry

Comfort Ropafadzo Kanji,
Bianza Tinotenda Mbavha,
Collen Masimirembwa
et al.

Abstract: Pharmacogenomic testing may be used to improve treatment outcomes and reduce the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Population specific, targeted pharmacogenetics (PGx) panel-based testing methods enable sensitive, accurate and economical implementation of precision medicine. We evaluated the analytical performance of the GenoPharm® custom open array platform which evaluates 120 SNPs across 46 pharmacogenes. Using commercially available reference samples (Coriell Biorepository) and in-house extracted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data presented here further support previous efforts calling for prioritization within disease areas and/or drug-gene pairs or drug classes within Southern Africa [43][44][45]. With the clinical genotyping of South African and Zimbabwean cohorts using a 46 gene panel revealing that 100% of participants harboured at least one actionable PGx variant, with a median distribution of four actionable variants [46], foregoing implementation has serious consequences for patients in sub-Saharan Africa. While concerns have been raised regarding the magnitude of ADR reduction reported in the PREPARE study, along with the limitations of focusing on only ADRs as an outcome in pharmacogenetic testing [47,48], it has also been argued that the reported effect size remains plausible due the limited scope and scale of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The data presented here further support previous efforts calling for prioritization within disease areas and/or drug-gene pairs or drug classes within Southern Africa [43][44][45]. With the clinical genotyping of South African and Zimbabwean cohorts using a 46 gene panel revealing that 100% of participants harboured at least one actionable PGx variant, with a median distribution of four actionable variants [46], foregoing implementation has serious consequences for patients in sub-Saharan Africa. While concerns have been raised regarding the magnitude of ADR reduction reported in the PREPARE study, along with the limitations of focusing on only ADRs as an outcome in pharmacogenetic testing [47,48], it has also been argued that the reported effect size remains plausible due the limited scope and scale of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Overall, our workflow was demonstrated to exhibit both accuracy and precision. When compared to other array-based PGx assays, our test exhibited performance levels closely aligned with the reported literature standards for accuracy (ranging from 93% to 100%) and precision (ranging from 97% to 100%) ( Hartshorne et al, 2013 ; Martins et al, 2013 ; Borobia et al, 2018 ; Collins et al, 2019 ; Tang et al, 2021 ; Kanji et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%