2021
DOI: 10.1177/10775463211038148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytically measure the vibratory characteristics of the cable-stayed bridge during dual-cantilever erection

Abstract: To analytically measure the vibratory characteristics of the cable-stayed bridge with beam-tower constraint during the dual-cantilever erection, the isolating/assembling technique is used to derive the global equation. Eigen-equation governing the frequencies/modes is obtained by applying the coefficients vectors transferring between adjacent cable-beams and the boundary/matching conditions. An illustrative example of the dual-cantilever erection system is given to verify the effectiveness of the analytical me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be particularly pointed that the order of Θ 0 in equation (19) for the ESB model is 4 × 4 for any number of intermediate k si . The transferring technique used here is inconsistent to that of other chained structures (Yi et al, 2019, 2021) where the influence of the number/non-uniformity of the elastic supports are not considered. The proposed ESB model is also different to the continuous beams (Johansson et al, 2013; Ariaei et al, 2013) whose order of the eigen-equation is rapidly increasing with the growth of the intermediate supports’ number.…”
Section: Illustrative Example and Discussion For Esb And Efb Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be particularly pointed that the order of Θ 0 in equation (19) for the ESB model is 4 × 4 for any number of intermediate k si . The transferring technique used here is inconsistent to that of other chained structures (Yi et al, 2019, 2021) where the influence of the number/non-uniformity of the elastic supports are not considered. The proposed ESB model is also different to the continuous beams (Johansson et al, 2013; Ariaei et al, 2013) whose order of the eigen-equation is rapidly increasing with the growth of the intermediate supports’ number.…”
Section: Illustrative Example and Discussion For Esb And Efb Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%