2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-018-9797-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyticity, Balance and Non-admissibility of $$\varvec{Cut}$$ Cut in Stoic Logic

Abstract: Abstract.This paper shows that, for the Hertz-Gentzen Systems of 1933 (without Thinning), extended by a classical rule T 1 (from the Stoics) and using certain axioms (also from the Stoics), all derivations are analytic: every cut formula occurs as a subformula in the cut's conclusion. Since the Stoic cut rules are instances of Gentzen's Cut rule of 1933, from this we infer the decidability of the propositional logic of the Stoics. We infer the correctness for this logic of a "relevance criterion" and of two "b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives us a direct deduction of A from Γ, Π − (P, Q) as required. The Lemma is one of the Stoic rules of inference, the first thema, T 1, for which see [1] or [2]. Proof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives us a direct deduction of A from Γ, Π − (P, Q) as required. The Lemma is one of the Stoic rules of inference, the first thema, T 1, for which see [1] or [2]. Proof.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%