2006
DOI: 10.1521/prev.2006.93.5.835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To my way of thinking this is a movement away from technique (instrumentation) toward who the analyst is and how this affects the analytic dyad. It seems clear that the person of the analyst is very much part of how he/she uses psychoanalytic concepts and technique (Frosch, 2006;Wilson, 2003).…”
Section: __________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To my way of thinking this is a movement away from technique (instrumentation) toward who the analyst is and how this affects the analytic dyad. It seems clear that the person of the analyst is very much part of how he/she uses psychoanalytic concepts and technique (Frosch, 2006;Wilson, 2003).…”
Section: __________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freud's idiosyncratic organization of wishes and defenses led to a view of the repetition compulsion as a manifestation of the death instinct and an ultimate obstacle to successful treatment because patients' repetition of their early dependency needs made it too difficult for them to separate from the analyst (cf. Frosch, 2006). I think that Freud fell into a trap that he warned us about in a short but important paper "On Psycho-Analysis": scientific arguments can support emotional resistances (1950c/1913, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we move away from a more idealized way of doing things we enter an area where so called tried and true psychoanalytic concepts such as interpretation or resistance can have multiple context - dependent meanings (Sandler, 1983). A rigid adherence to one meaning for example, the standard or idealized meaning, can reflect “theory driven countertransference” (Frosch, 2006). This subjective distortion of the analytic process can play a major role in shaping our ideas about analyzability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%