2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
68
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For chipping piles located in the terrain an extraction distance of 80 m to the roadside is assumed, using the same speed as a normal forwarder (38 m· min −1 ) and 5 min for emptying the bin into the container at roadside. A utilization rate of 76% is assumed for the in-field chipper [42]. For chipping at roadside, delays due to waiting for containers and the more restricted work space decrease the chipper utilization to around 74% [42].…”
Section: Chippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For chipping piles located in the terrain an extraction distance of 80 m to the roadside is assumed, using the same speed as a normal forwarder (38 m· min −1 ) and 5 min for emptying the bin into the container at roadside. A utilization rate of 76% is assumed for the in-field chipper [42]. For chipping at roadside, delays due to waiting for containers and the more restricted work space decrease the chipper utilization to around 74% [42].…”
Section: Chippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A utilization rate of 76% is assumed for the in-field chipper [42]. For chipping at roadside, delays due to waiting for containers and the more restricted work space decrease the chipper utilization to around 74% [42]. A chipper placed at a central terminal inevitably has good working conditions and a good supply of raw material, and the utilization is set to 90%.…”
Section: Chippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That seems the closest match to the description provided above, and should offer a viable proxy. Previous studies of chipper delays indicate that delay events with a maximum duration of 15 min account for only one-third of total delay time, and therefore the productivity estimates returned by the model are substantially higher than the actual productivity calculated on the basis of total scheduled time [9]. In that regard, one must notice that different machine meters record time in different ways: some simply measure the time when the engine is on-even if idle-while others only record the time when the engine runs above a certain rotational regime, thus excluding idle time.…”
Section: Robust Productivity Modelmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…8 h). More fundamental and accurate statements on delay times can only be obtained by long-term follow-up studies or by combining a larger number of machine category specific time studies [39]. Recent studies on screening machines showed much higher shares of delay times: Spinelli et al [14] found a total share of delay times of ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%