2011
DOI: 10.1080/00018732.2011.572452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing and modeling real-world phenomena with complex networks: a survey of applications

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
391
0
47

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 656 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 556 publications
1
391
0
47
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the application, vertices and edges have different meanings [1,3]. For example, in condensed matter physics, vertices and edges of the ordered network known as Anderson's tight-binding model are the sites and hopping integrals, respectively [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the application, vertices and edges have different meanings [1,3]. For example, in condensed matter physics, vertices and edges of the ordered network known as Anderson's tight-binding model are the sites and hopping integrals, respectively [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networks have been used to represent the organization of complex systems, such as social networks, Internet, and ecosystems [1,2]. Depending on the application, vertices and edges have different meanings [1,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of α lower than or equal to c provided a utility equal to 0 since agents estimated that the expected reward was not enough to compensate the cost of the forwarding action. Values of α that were in the interval (5,10] made some agents estimate that the forwarding action was going to be profitable. Although the value for α was enough for agents to consider forwarding tasks, their utility was not always positive for all of the agents.…”
Section: The Influence Of Structural Properties and The Reward Payoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the average utility had a negative value. The interval (5,10] for α values could be considered risky. The average utility became positive with α values greater than 10 (see Figure 4 left).…”
Section: The Influence Of Structural Properties and The Reward Payoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation