Analyzing challenging aspects of IPv6 over IPv4

Ashraf, Shahzad; Muhammad, Durr; Aslam, Zeeshan

doi:10.26555/jiteki.v16i1.17105

Cited by 24 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…IPv6 is used in the creation of IoT devices and network sensors. IPv6 now supports 128-bit transfers (Nithya & alias Jeyanthi, 2017;Ashraf et al, 2020;Hamid et al, 2021;Kalwar et al, 2015;Wahyudi, 2021).…”

Section: Internet Protocol Version 6 (Ipv6)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of IP Versions 4, 5, and 6

Alnile

Mohialden

Ahmed

2021

JLMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research examines the Internet Protocol (IP) versions 4, 5, and 6, as well as the differences between them and which protocol is more suitable for the future of the internet, among other things. Through this research, we have established the most advantageous characteristics of these protocols, as well as the specific elements that each protocol uses to allow the internet network to operate at maximum capacity. The main aim of this study is to discover which of the internet protocols, IPv4, IPv5, or IPv6, is the most widely used. IPv4 is the most widely used protocol, followed by IPv5. The most essential elements of getting a more relevant job on the internet network are highlighted in this article. It all comes down to how IP protocols operate and what they accomplish.

show abstract

Section: Internet Protocol Version 6 (Ipv6)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of IP Versions 4, 5, and 6

Alnile

Mohialden

Ahmed

2021

JLMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Problem Formulation. For the proposed coverage model, a two-dimensional coverage area [25] has been considered. Further, the coverage area is divided into various segments each having unit size.…”

Section: Coverage Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bodacious-Instance Coverage Mechanism for Wireless Sensor Network

Ashraf

Alfandi

Ahmad³

et al. 2020

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to unavoidable environmental factors, wireless sensor networks are facing numerous tribulations regarding network coverage. These arose due to the uncouth deployment of the sensor nodes in the wireless coverage area that ultimately degrades the performance and confines the coverage range. In order to enhance the network coverage range, an instance (node) redeployment-based Bodacious-instance Coverage Mechanism (BiCM) is proposed. The proposed mechanism creates new instance positions in the coverage area. It operates in two stages; in the first stage, it locates the intended instance position through the Dissimilitude Enhancement Scheme (DES) and moves the instance to a new position, while the second stage is called the depuration, when the moving distance between the initial and intended instance positions is sagaciously reduced. Further, the variations of various parameters of BiCM such as loudness, pulse emission rate, maximum frequency, grid points, and sensing radius have been explored, and the optimized parameters are identified. The performance metric has been meticulously analyzed through simulation results and is compared with the state-of-the-art Fruit Fly Optimization Algorithm (FOA) and, one step above, the tuned BiCM algorithm in terms of mean coverage rate, computation time, and standard deviation. The coverage range curve for various numbers of iterations and sensor nodes is also presented for the tuned Bodacious-instance Coverage Mechanism (tuned BiCM), BiCM, and FOA. The performance metrics generated by the simulation have vouched for the effectiveness of tuned BiCM as it achieved more coverage range than BiCM and FOA.

show abstract

“…Internet Service Provider (ISP) slowly seeking to migrate IPv4 physical network to IPv6. However it is impossible to carry out the transition of IPv4 to IPv6 in a short period of time due to many reasons including cost, lack of technical support and lack of web content available over IPv6 (Quintero, Sans & Gamess, 2016) and also due to incompatibly issues (Ashraf, Muhammad & Aslam, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study between IPv4 and IPv6

Hamid¹,

Daud²,

Razak³

et al. 2021

ANP-JSSH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The transition between the Internet Protocol Version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) will be a long process during both protocol coexists and it unreasonable to expect that many millions of IPv4 nodes will be converted overnight. Mobility is becoming ubiquitous nowadays. This paper has described about a background study of IPv4 and IPv6, the needs of IPv6, transition mechanisms in the various architectures, and comparison of the IPv4 and IPv6 in two major areas; header format and transition mechanism. Then, the transformation of IPv4 to IPv6 addressing by using tunnel and dual stack protocol will be discussed.

show abstract

Analyzing challenging aspects of IPv6 over IPv4

Cited by 24 publications

References 20 publications

A comparative study of IP Versions 4, 5, and 6

A comparative study of IP Versions 4, 5, and 6

Bodacious-Instance Coverage Mechanism for Wireless Sensor Network

A Comparative Study between IPv4 and IPv6

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About