2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5125493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing collective motion with machine learning and topology

Abstract: We use topological data analysis and machine learning to study a seminal model of collective motion in biology [D'Orsogna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006)]. This model describes agents interacting nonlinearly via attractive-repulsive social forces and gives rise to collective behaviors such as flocking and milling. To classify the emergent collective motion in a large library of numerical simulations and to recover model parameters from the simulation data, we apply machine learning techniques to two differe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As was the case with the zonal model, all simulations were performed over an unbounded domain. Previous work with the ODE model suggests that emergent behaviour stabilises by around 2000 simulation time steps, [ 45 ], albeit for larger groups with N = 200, and for calculations run with time steps of 0.05 units. The same study also notes that the model of [ 22 ] typically behaves independent of initial conditions, [ 45 ], but for our work we found multiple group-level patterns of movement emerging for the same set of model parameters (as noted in Table 3 ).…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As was the case with the zonal model, all simulations were performed over an unbounded domain. Previous work with the ODE model suggests that emergent behaviour stabilises by around 2000 simulation time steps, [ 45 ], albeit for larger groups with N = 200, and for calculations run with time steps of 0.05 units. The same study also notes that the model of [ 22 ] typically behaves independent of initial conditions, [ 45 ], but for our work we found multiple group-level patterns of movement emerging for the same set of model parameters (as noted in Table 3 ).…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work with the ODE model suggests that emergent behaviour stabilises by around 2000 simulation time steps, [ 45 ], albeit for larger groups with N = 200, and for calculations run with time steps of 0.05 units. The same study also notes that the model of [ 22 ] typically behaves independent of initial conditions, [ 45 ], but for our work we found multiple group-level patterns of movement emerging for the same set of model parameters (as noted in Table 3 ). Where possible we sought to generate data from at least 10 realisations (and up to 80) representative of a particular emergent state for given parameter values ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How can one summarize this much geometric content for use in machine learning tasks, say to predict how the motion of the flock will vary next, or to predict some of the parameters in a mathematical model approximately governing the motion of the birds? Persistent homology has been used in Topaz et al (2015), Ulmer et al (2019), Bhaskar et al (2019), Adams et al (2020b), and Xian et al (2020) to reduce a large collection of geometric content down to a concise summary. These datasets of animal swarms do not lie along beautiful manifolds (global shapes), but nevertheless there is a wealth of information in the local geometry as measured by the short persistent homology bars.…”
Section: Examples Measuring Local Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the use of topological data analysis (TDA) has also entered the mix, to help address some of these questions. The examples provided by [82][83][84][85] show how TDA can be applied even more effectively than the traditional physicsbased order parameters to compare data and model output. Such novel methods could help to begin addressing questions where model hypotheses are to be compared with observed behavior.…”
Section: From Single To Collective Cell Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%