2010 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/scc.2010.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Communities vs. Single Agent-Based Web Services: Trust Perspectives

Abstract: Abstract-Gathering functionally similar agent-based Web services into communities has been proposed and promoted on many occasions. In this paper, we compare the performance of these communities with self-managed, single agent-based Web services from trust perspective. To this end, we deploy a reputation model that ranks communities and Web services with respect to different reputation parameters. By relating the parameters, we extend our discussion to analyze the beneficial cases and incentives for a single W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46][47][48][49] Two types of roles are defined for community members: The protocol is centrally executed by the community manager agent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[46][47][48][49] Two types of roles are defined for community members: The protocol is centrally executed by the community manager agent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This architecture has been further extended in previous studies. [46][47][48][49] Two types of roles are defined for community members:…”
Section: Maamar Et Al Initially In One Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will lead to a poor efficiency and therefore a drop in the users' satisfaction and reputation [6]. As argued in [4] and [6], a solution is to group different web services in a community.…”
Section: Community Of Web Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will lead to a poor efficiency and therefore a drop in the users' satisfaction and reputation [6]. As argued in [4] and [6], a solution is to group different web services in a community. By aggregating the total number of requests that each single web service can handle, and redistributing them among all the members, a community will be granted a better availability and hence better efficiency.…”
Section: Community Of Web Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As web service composition make use of different web services and malfunctioning of one of them can lead to the whole system failure, we can prevent this situation by verifying each single web service. Furthermore, in a community of web services [2], a community master can accept or reject a web service after its verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%