2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12187-012-9173-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Differences in Child Well-Being Among U.S. States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Bradshaw et al (2007: 135), Bwell-being can be defined as the realization of children's rights and the fulfillment of the opportunity for every child to be all she or he can be.^In addition, according to the Child and Youth Well-Being Index (Land et al 2001: 243), Bthe overall well-being of children and young people ... is defined in terms of averages of social conditions encountered by children and young people. Furthermore, the seven domains of health, material well-being, education, risk and safety, family, personal well-being, and housing and the environment were selected as child well-being dimensions. Other studies in this area have similar dimensions (UNICEF 2007;Heshmati et al 2007) although in some studies different aspects of well-being such as school (OECD 2009) and social relationships (O'Hare et al 2013) have been considered. As our study shows, there were many differences in the CWBI scores among the provinces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bradshaw et al (2007: 135), Bwell-being can be defined as the realization of children's rights and the fulfillment of the opportunity for every child to be all she or he can be.^In addition, according to the Child and Youth Well-Being Index (Land et al 2001: 243), Bthe overall well-being of children and young people ... is defined in terms of averages of social conditions encountered by children and young people. Furthermore, the seven domains of health, material well-being, education, risk and safety, family, personal well-being, and housing and the environment were selected as child well-being dimensions. Other studies in this area have similar dimensions (UNICEF 2007;Heshmati et al 2007) although in some studies different aspects of well-being such as school (OECD 2009) and social relationships (O'Hare et al 2013) have been considered. As our study shows, there were many differences in the CWBI scores among the provinces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural-urban differences have been attributed to a number of variables including family income (e.g., O'Hare et al, 2013) and education (e.g., Provasnik et al, 2007). However, income appears to have the greatest positive impact on early academic skills in large urban areas rather than small urban, suburban, or rural contexts .…”
Section: Context and Time Within The Ppct Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Childhood and adolescence are particularly important stages in the lifecourse with regards to well-being (Ben-Arieh, 2008;Handbook of Child Well-Being, 2014). Numerous indices have emerged with the goal of capturing the well-being of children and adolescents in the United States (Buck et al, 2018;Land et al, 2001Land et al, , 2007Moore et al, 2007Moore et al, , 2008O'Hare & Bramstedt, 2003;O'Hare et al, 2013). However, these measures suffer from several issues that prevent more widespread usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous indices comprised of outcome indicators of child and adolescent wellbeing have been developed in recent decades. In the United States the most prominent are the Child and Youth Well-Being and the KIDS COUNT indices (Land et al, 2001(Land et al, , 2007O'Hare & Bramstedt, 2003;O'Hare et al, 2013). However, these indices have certain limitations that may prove significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%