Volume 2: Structures, Safety, and Reliability 2022
DOI: 10.1115/omae2022-78795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Extreme Sea State Conditions by Time-Series Simulation

Abstract: This paper presents an extreme value analysis on data of significant wave height based on time-series simulation. A method to simulate time series with given marginal distribution and preserving the autocorrelation structure in the data is applied to significant wave height data. Then, extreme value analysis is performed by simulating from the fitted time-series model that preserves both the marginal probability distribution and the autocorrelation. In this way, the effect of serial correlation on the extreme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[41] and hence might not always be suitable. This occurred for some of the sites on the raw data (see [12]), but not for the seasonally normalized data in this study. Note also that the empirical autocorrelation functions shown in Figure 7 look very different from the autocorrelation functions of the raw data, as shown in [12], and that they now more clearly tend to zero for increasing lags.…”
Section: Autocorrelation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[41] and hence might not always be suitable. This occurred for some of the sites on the raw data (see [12]), but not for the seasonally normalized data in this study. Note also that the empirical autocorrelation functions shown in Figure 7 look very different from the autocorrelation functions of the raw data, as shown in [12], and that they now more clearly tend to zero for increasing lags.…”
Section: Autocorrelation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This occurred for some of the sites on the raw data (see [12]), but not for the seasonally normalized data in this study. Note also that the empirical autocorrelation functions shown in Figure 7 look very different from the autocorrelation functions of the raw data, as shown in [12], and that they now more clearly tend to zero for increasing lags. This is obviously because the seasonal components have been removed, and the pre-processed data are much better suited for the time-series modelling proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Autocorrelation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations