1998
DOI: 10.3758/bf03209475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the different methods that have been developed to quantify random generation behavior and incorporate these measurement scales into a Windows95 computer program called RgCalc. RgCalc analyzes the quality of human attempts at random generation and can provide computer-generated, pseudorandom sequences for comparison. The program is designed to be appropriate for the analysis of various types of random generation situations employed in the psychological literature. The different algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
293
0
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
16
293
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In analysing random generation performance it is common to pre-process response sequences to generate a set of indices of randomness for each sequence (see, e.g., Towse & Neil, 1998). These indices measure different aspects of randomness, and can be treated as the task's dependent measures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analysing random generation performance it is common to pre-process response sequences to generate a set of indices of randomness for each sequence (see, e.g., Towse & Neil, 1998). These indices measure different aspects of randomness, and can be treated as the task's dependent measures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It varies between 0 to 1, with higher indices representing less randomness, which was predicted for the patient group on grounds of their hypothetically enhanced response stereotypy. Further information and mathematical details of these calculations are described elsewhere (Towse & Neil, 1998). Conceptually, both our counting measure (FOD=1) and the TPI primarily rely on frontal executive functions; we did not use a measure tapping more into the working memory components of RNG.…”
Section: Rng Task Performance Measures and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for response stereotypy, a measure of zero-order redundancy and a RNGindex reflecting redundancy on the level of pair frequencies were calculated for each participant's number sequence (Towse & Neil, 1998). SNB in RNG was calculated as the difference between the total occurrence of small numbers (1, 2, 3) and the total occurrence of large numbers (4,5,6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%