2005
DOI: 10.1007/11499169_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Object Detection Quality Under Probabilistic Coverage in Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract. Object detection quality and network lifetime are two conflicting aspects of a sensor network, but both are critical to many sensor applications such as military surveillance. Probabilistic coverage is an appropriate approach to balancing the conflicting design requirements of monitoring applications. Under probabilistic coverage, we present an analytical model to analyze object detection quality with respect to different network conditions and sensor scheduling schemes. Our analytical model facilita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, no one has proposed a median search algorithm for sensor-tags. We believe the research in this paper on RFID sensors can be applied to other sensor network or security problems (Xuan et al, 2002;Ren et al, 2005;Xing et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2008). …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, no one has proposed a median search algorithm for sensor-tags. We believe the research in this paper on RFID sensors can be applied to other sensor network or security problems (Xuan et al, 2002;Ren et al, 2005;Xing et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2008). …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power management protocols. Related work on power management protocols for sensor networks include [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In [9], a sensor is allowed to go to sleep if and only if one of its neighbors can completely cover its sensing area.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, existing platforms (e.g., nesC/TinyOS [4]) for programming sensor networks use event-driven programming model and, hence, require the designer be responsible for stack management, buffer management, and flow control [5,6]. Therefore, to rapidly prototype and quickly evaluate protocols, the designers of existing power management protocols (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]) implement their own simulators or model their protocols in specialized simulators (e.g., GloMoSim [14]). However, it is desirable that the designers prototype their protocols in nesC/TinyOS platform as it provides a framework for generating both simulation as well as production code from the same source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous protocol design of the random and the synchronized schedules in [12], we focused on how to meet the requirements of detection probability, average stealth distance and energy consumption. However, worst-case object detection quality metrics, such as sufficient phase and worst-case stealth distance, are not bounded in these protocols.…”
Section: Object Detection and Tracking Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, full sensing coverage requires that a large portion of the sensors remain awake continuously, resulting in energy inefficiency and short system lifetime. As an alternative approach, probabilistic sensing coverage has been recently proposed in [5,12]. Instead of staying awake all the time, nodes can periodically rotate between active state and sleeping state to conserve energy while meeting the object detection quality requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%