1981
DOI: 10.2307/356602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Revision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
122
1
6

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
122
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There also exist typologies that focus on concrete paraphrase cases, such as paraphrases involving support-verb constructions (Barreiro, 2008: pp. 73-81), and typologies that come from paraphrase related fields, such as text reuse (Clough, 2003: p. 100) or editing (Faigley & Witte, 1981).…”
Section: Paraphrase Typologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also exist typologies that focus on concrete paraphrase cases, such as paraphrases involving support-verb constructions (Barreiro, 2008: pp. 73-81), and typologies that come from paraphrase related fields, such as text reuse (Clough, 2003: p. 100) or editing (Faigley & Witte, 1981).…”
Section: Paraphrase Typologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An editing taxonomy has been given by Faigley & Witte [15] in 1981 which div ides revisions into two major categories; surface changes and meaning changes, each of which have 2 subcategories finally cu lminating into 23 types at the lowest level.…”
Section: Chronological Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful revision is not about how many times the author made changes. It is about creating a text that is the closest to the planned text (Faigley and Witte, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables are situational variables. Situational variables are: reason of writing, format, language, type, writer's confidence while writing, writer's familiarity with the subject, writer's understanding of the audience, level of formality, and length of writing (Faigley and Witte, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%