2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Sanitation Sustainability Assessment Frameworks for Resource-Limited Communities

Abstract: Diverse and numerous sanitation sustainability assessment frameworks have been created 10 to enhance the ability of systems to provide safe sanitation services, especially in resource-limited 11 contexts. However, many go unused while new frameworks are developed and high sanitation 12 system failure rates persist. To better support the Sustainable Development Goal around global 13 sanitation, there is a need to better understand how sanitation sustainability is defined and 14 measured and the potential advant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More broadly, there is a continued lack of consensus within the WASH sector over how to evaluate the sustainability of household sanitation services in resource-limited settings, with at least six different frameworks in current usage. Our results highlight the importance of including indicators that measure technical components of sanitation facilities such as quality of materials and ease of reconstruction in such frameworks, which not all frameworks currently include …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More broadly, there is a continued lack of consensus within the WASH sector over how to evaluate the sustainability of household sanitation services in resource-limited settings, with at least six different frameworks in current usage. Our results highlight the importance of including indicators that measure technical components of sanitation facilities such as quality of materials and ease of reconstruction in such frameworks, which not all frameworks currently include …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“… 52 − 57 Our results highlight the importance of including indicators that measure technical components of sanitation facilities such as quality of materials and ease of reconstruction in such frameworks, which not all frameworks currently include. 58 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be performed in conjunction with MCDA to generate a single score or recommendation. When aggregating indicators, their weights can be determined by experts (the lowest stakeholder input and influence option), 205 derived from archetypal schemes representing different societal groups, 206 or developed for the specific study by stakeholders that directly interact with the technology (the highest stakeholder inputs and influence option). 207,208 Overall, as each stakeholder engagement method has limitations, the selection of stakeholders should be a careful process that balances resource requirements, social dynamics, resources than interviewing each of the individuals, may not reflect individual goals 209 and can suppress marginalized voices, 210 resulting in a lack of comprehensive goals, 186,211 influences, 212 and decision criteria.…”
Section: Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanitation systems reveal especially high failure rates [5,6,7,8] and sanitation interventions often lag behind initial policy expectations [9,10,11]. This is particularly true for past sanitation campaigns in India, such as the Central Rural Sanitation Programme (1986) or the Total Sanitation Campaign (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%