ABSTRACT. -Freshwater turtle courtship is an exciting and potentially phylogenetically important field of study. Scattered data exist from the past century of research, yet no recent summary is available. Courtship in freshwater turtles includes a number of common behaviors, which usually involve visual, tactile, olfactory, and auditory signals. These signals function in both species and sex recognition and in the seduction of potential mates. Specific behavioral sequences are required to facilitate successful copulation, and these behaviors presumably play a role in mate choice. We performed a series of meta-analyses to investigate the evolution of courtship behavior in freshwater turtles. Biting, an aggressive form of courtship behavior, is plesiomorphic, conserved only in the Chelydridae, Kinosternidae, subfamily Emydinae and South American species in the Pleurodira. Head movement and foreclaw display are apparently apomorphic and evolved independently in the Geoemydinae, Deirochelyinae, and Australian species of the Pleurodira. Display type (pre-or postmounting display) and sexual size dimorphism also show phylogenetic patterns. Therefore, the evolution of courtship behavior in freshwater turtles might accompany the evolution of sexual dimorphism, which is directly subject to natural selection.KEY WORDS. -Meta-analysis; sexual dimorphism; mating signal; natural selectionThe courtship behavior of freshwater turtles (CBFT) has been a topic of research interest for over a century. Anecdotal reports and more detailed observational studies have identified visual, tactile, chemical, and auditory stimuli. Early reviews by Carpenter and Ferguson (1977) and Harless (1979) noted a paucity of data. Over 30 yrs later, an impressive body of literature on CBFT has accumulated, but this literature is scattered, and no recent summary is available. Thus, although observations of courtship behavior exist for many species, our understanding of how CBFT operates remains limited because the functions of most signals used in courtship remain elusive. This is partly attributable to logistical difficulties involved in studying behavior in freshwater turtles and to the difficulty of determining the interpretation of signals by the receiver.Some more rigorous studies have produced quantifiable models of courtship behavior (e.g., Baker and Gillingham 1983;Liu et al. 2008), and these lend themselves to hypothesis testing. However, analyses and applications of ethograms based on stereotype patterns remain rare, and this precludes combining ethograms for comparative studies. Harless (1979) has identified necessary steps to move forward-hypothesis testing, identification of stimuli that elicit signaling, and identification of signal function-and much of this remains to be accomplished.Herein, we provide a brief history of the study of CBFT. We review behaviors and signals currently implicated in turtle courtship studies and discuss the methods and statistical analyses commonly used in these studies. This review unifies descriptions of beh...