2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using Gaussian and logit models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autocorrelation is a common source of lack of independence encountered in spatial studies in ecology (Carl and Kü hn 2007).The use of multiple logistic models requires the statistical assumption of independence. Spatial autocorrelation may affect error and parameter estimates of the statistical model (Legendre 1993, Lennon 2000, but doesn't necessarily invalidate the statistical model (Boyce et al 2002, Diniz-Filho et al 2003.…”
Section: Predictive Models Of Foraging Distribution Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autocorrelation is a common source of lack of independence encountered in spatial studies in ecology (Carl and Kü hn 2007).The use of multiple logistic models requires the statistical assumption of independence. Spatial autocorrelation may affect error and parameter estimates of the statistical model (Legendre 1993, Lennon 2000, but doesn't necessarily invalidate the statistical model (Boyce et al 2002, Diniz-Filho et al 2003.…”
Section: Predictive Models Of Foraging Distribution Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation within a cluster can be specified by two different structures: (1) quadratic, where the correlation varies with distance class (Carl and Ku¨hn 2007; for example, a block of 2 3 2 sampling stations contains two distance classes, therefore two correlation parameters need to be estimated) and (2) exchangeable. All correlations within a cluster are equal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to these iterative steps (2 and 3) the data were clustered into smaller blocks of 2 3 2, 3 3 3, or 4 3 4 sampling stations to reduce computation time. Correlations within each cluster were included in the model, while correlations between clusters were assumed to be absent (Carl andKu¨hn 2007, Koper andManseau 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With non-normally distributed data, such as binomial or Poisson, we will need a generalization of the methods described above. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) are generalizations of Generalized Linear Models (GLM) to include autocorrelation structures (Diggle et al 1995;Yan and Fine 2004;Carl and Kühn 2007). Another option is the use of Generalized linear mixed effect models (Blackburn and Duncan 2001) or the use of and Generalized Least Squares, which are also apt to correct for SAC in analyses with non-normally distributed residuals when a correlation structure is defined.…”
Section: Spatial Non-independence Of Introduction Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%