2016
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201601049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Case for Bifunctional Catalysis

Abstract: Bifunctional coupling of two different catalytic site types has often been invoked to explain experimentally observed enhanced catalytic activities. We scrutinize such claims with generic scaling-relation-based microkinetic models that allow exploration of the theoretical limits for such a bifunctional gain for several model reactions. For sites at transition-metal surfaces, the universality of the scaling relations between adsorption energies largely prevents any improvements through bifunctionality. Only the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For one of the most important reasons, DFT calculations have provided the insight into predicting the ORR/OER activity of the materials. [3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] This physical framework is used to estimate the free energy changes corresponding to elementary steps involving proton-coupled electron transfer on the catalyst surface. For the other, some analytical and characterization techniques including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray absorption/diffraction, Mössbauer spectroscopy and so on, allow us to monitor the ORR/OER in situ and confirm the actual active phase/intermediates and electrochemical behavior during ORR/OER on the surface of the materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one of the most important reasons, DFT calculations have provided the insight into predicting the ORR/OER activity of the materials. [3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] This physical framework is used to estimate the free energy changes corresponding to elementary steps involving proton-coupled electron transfer on the catalyst surface. For the other, some analytical and characterization techniques including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray absorption/diffraction, Mössbauer spectroscopy and so on, allow us to monitor the ORR/OER in situ and confirm the actual active phase/intermediates and electrochemical behavior during ORR/OER on the surface of the materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thefact that edges respond strongly to diffusion and presence of facet sites,isrelated to the supply of oxygen. [30,31] These results further emphasize the benefit of having awide distribution of sites to benefit from the principle of least resistance. Forthe present reaction, alarge difference in reactivity between low and high-coordinated sites leads to ab eneficial situation where CO and Oc an be abundant on the particle simultaneously.T his enhances the activity as compared to reactions over extended surfaces, where the reaction energy landscape is homogeneous.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 67%
“…Although scaling relationships predict Au to have good selectivity (albeit poor activity) for alcohol synthesis, decreasing size of nanoparticles can shift the activity to favor CO oxidation . At present, the insights gained from scaling relationships for alcohol synthesis are primarily limited to metals, but the combination of active metals and oxides such as metal‐exchanged zeolites and mixed metal oxides can be used to break away from the activity/selectivity limits observed in these relationships . Separate reaction steps can be optimized on different active sites for an overall better reaction performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%