2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the habitat suitability for migratory birds at the Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve in Shanghai, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typological classification of delineated wetland units: assignment of mapped wetland bodies into hydrological, geomorphological and ecological categories without detailed mapping of within-wetland cover [6,27,29,37,43,44,55,65,66,73,79,80]; (3). Classification of within-wetland cover types and/or vegetation: mapping within-wetland surface composition and vegetation types, sometimes targeting specific classes such as invasive plant species (e.g., [5,8,12,13,17,[23][24][25]28,30,32,34,41,45,[48][49][50]52,53,57,68,69,[74][75][76][77][79][80][81][82][83][84][85]); (4). Analysis of wetland change over a particular period of time...…”
Section: Research Objectives and Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typological classification of delineated wetland units: assignment of mapped wetland bodies into hydrological, geomorphological and ecological categories without detailed mapping of within-wetland cover [6,27,29,37,43,44,55,65,66,73,79,80]; (3). Classification of within-wetland cover types and/or vegetation: mapping within-wetland surface composition and vegetation types, sometimes targeting specific classes such as invasive plant species (e.g., [5,8,12,13,17,[23][24][25]28,30,32,34,41,45,[48][49][50]52,53,57,68,69,[74][75][76][77][79][80][81][82][83][84][85]); (4). Analysis of wetland change over a particular period of time...…”
Section: Research Objectives and Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen studies used the data from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) either as the primary input or in combination with Landsat or other sensors [27,37,40,43,47,53,54,71,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]82] Natural log of pixel size in m overall accuracy less than 85% overall accuracy equal or greater than 85% overall accuracy not reported and ALOS PALSAR [40,79,80]; spatial resolution of these datasets varied between 10 and 100 m. Radar images as inputs to OBIA have been especially critical for wetland analyses in humid regions with frequent cloud cover limiting the availability of multi-spectral images and the consistency of seasonal time series [37,75,82]. Several high-resolution studies using multi-spectral imagery additionally incorporated light detection and ranging (lidar) datasets to facilitate the overall wetland classification or discrimination of specific classes and landscape features [6,25,28,32,59,71,77,80,89].…”
Section: General Characteristics Of Input Data and Classification Accmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broadest extent of literature has emphasized defining individual plant reflectance spectra and optimizing spectral discrimination of vegetation classes [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. Other studies have tested innovative approaches to classifying vegetation, including comparing use of different remote sensing data sources [65][66][67][68][69], testing object-based image analysis techniques [69][70][71][72][73][74][75], and other methods [76][77][78]. In addition to automated analysis methods, vegetation classes have long been digitized by hand [79][80][81].…”
Section: Invoking Multiple Stable State Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water level may be such a key missing factor which often determines spatial location of waterbirds within the study area and access to food resources [8,43,45]; however, spatially explicit water level data have not been monitored at the sub-lake scale in the Poyang Lake region. Finally, study results could be affected by more general constraints of remote sensing analyses in wetlands, such as heterogeneity of wetland surface as a challenge to classification accuracy that may be partially addressed by OBIA [29,57,85] and relatively coarse resolution of 30-m Landsat data obscuring local patterns of vegetation composition and micro-topography [57].…”
Section: Uncertainties In Models and Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel object-based image analysis (OBIA) methods and machine learning image classification algorithms offer promise to enhance the quality of wetland cover mapping and interpretation, although these techniques are still relatively under-utilized [29][30][31][32]. Another caveat to spatial analyses of ecosystem and habitat properties is presented by potential spatial dependence (autocorrelation), which may violate the assumptions of independent and identically distributed errors in landscape models but in some cases indicate ecological processes such as dispersal or species interactions [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%