2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Influence of Measurements in Dynamical Parameter Identification Using Parametric Sensitivities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the parameter identification procedure for the slip-free model are shown in Table 3, where 𝑓 0 is the final value of the cost function of the optimal problem as formulated in Equation (10) defining the prediction accuracy relative to the training set and 𝑓 v is the validation score. It can be observed that while the single shooting method and the full discretizazion problem yields equivalent results, the gradient matching approach appears to be slightly more robust while at the same time showing a worse training accuracy as expressed by the final value of the cost function 𝑓 0 .…”
Section: Slip-free Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of the parameter identification procedure for the slip-free model are shown in Table 3, where 𝑓 0 is the final value of the cost function of the optimal problem as formulated in Equation (10) defining the prediction accuracy relative to the training set and 𝑓 v is the validation score. It can be observed that while the single shooting method and the full discretizazion problem yields equivalent results, the gradient matching approach appears to be slightly more robust while at the same time showing a worse training accuracy as expressed by the final value of the cost function 𝑓 0 .…”
Section: Slip-free Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization problem is solved using the Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) implementation of the WORHP solver for nonlinear programming [9]. In Sections 4.1–4.3, the WORHP‐based single shooting , full discretization , and gradient matching methods are, respectively, shown with an outline of their mathematical formulation [10]. In Figure 4, the overall procedure for the identification of the unknown parameters and the subsequent validation is illustrated.…”
Section: Methods For Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model's state derivative values depend on the optimization parameters p ∈ R np , current state values, and on the controls applied (usually supplied in the measurement data), which have to be approximated to the time point of model evaluation as u app (t) ∈ R nu . Solving this problem is possible in a number of ways, in the following the approach of full discretization [7] as implemented in the software tool Topas Model Fitting [8] will be used, relying on the nonlinear solver WORHP [9]. With the correct parameters found, the model function can be applied to generate a forecast of the respective propertyfor a dynamical system, that means integrating the ODE (here using the odeint-function of Python Library SciPy).…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Data-based Modelling and Parameter...mentioning
confidence: 99%