2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Profile Modification of Truck-trailer to Prune the Aerodynamic Drag and its Repercussion on Fuel Consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A computational simulation was investigated on a full-scale and model of Class-8 trucks equipped with devices of drag reduction, the obtained results were validated with experimental result and the effect of unsteady flows on the fuel reduced are also determined by Hyams et al, [25]. The trucktrailer profile modification was analysed numerically to predict the aerodynamic drag and its effect on the fuel consumption, shear stress transportation turbulence model (SST) was used, the obtained results indicate that the modification profiles can be able to reduce the aerodynamic drag around 21%, which reduces the consumption of fuel by about 4L per 100km for truck of diesel-powered [26]. The effect of cabin profiles devices on the aerodynamic drag reduction were investigated computationally and experimentally on a 1/50 th scale model of semi-trailer truck using CFD analysis and wind tunnel testes, the obtained results indicate that the truck profile modifications have significant impact on drag reduction and using all drag reduction devices at their optimized positions and dimensions can be able to reduce the drag by about 36.03 % compared to the standard heavytrucks without any modifications [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A computational simulation was investigated on a full-scale and model of Class-8 trucks equipped with devices of drag reduction, the obtained results were validated with experimental result and the effect of unsteady flows on the fuel reduced are also determined by Hyams et al, [25]. The trucktrailer profile modification was analysed numerically to predict the aerodynamic drag and its effect on the fuel consumption, shear stress transportation turbulence model (SST) was used, the obtained results indicate that the modification profiles can be able to reduce the aerodynamic drag around 21%, which reduces the consumption of fuel by about 4L per 100km for truck of diesel-powered [26]. The effect of cabin profiles devices on the aerodynamic drag reduction were investigated computationally and experimentally on a 1/50 th scale model of semi-trailer truck using CFD analysis and wind tunnel testes, the obtained results indicate that the truck profile modifications have significant impact on drag reduction and using all drag reduction devices at their optimized positions and dimensions can be able to reduce the drag by about 36.03 % compared to the standard heavytrucks without any modifications [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In CFD studies the change in turbulence intensity does not change the pressure distribution on the model [8]. The aerodynamic structure of a truck trailer model was examined by the CFD method and the CD coefficient of the truck trailer model was improved by 21% by adding passive flow control components [9]. They examined the flow structure around a bus model using the CFD method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They improved the CD coefficient of the truck trailer model by 21% by adding passive flow control components consisting of spoiler, six vortex holders and a trailer back extension. They stated that this result would reduce the fuel consumption about 4 liters at 100 km [6]. Patil et al (2012) examined the flow structure around a bus model using the CFD method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stated that this was caused by reduced the negative pressure area behind the car [5]. Chilbule et al (2014) examined the aerodynamic structure of a truck trailer model by the CFD method. They improved the CD coefficient of the truck trailer model by 21% by adding passive flow control components consisting of spoiler, six vortex holders and a trailer back extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%