Anti-lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender/queer (LGBTQ) public policy has been seen to have an adverse impact on the mental health of gender and sexual minorities (Herek, 2011; Rostosky & Riggle, 2017). An example of such discriminatory legislation is Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, a law that penalizes nonheteronormative forms of sexual expression and is used to disproportionately target the LGBTQ community in India. As such, Section 377 may serve as a source of minority stress under Meyer’s (2003) minority stress model, which posits that LGBTQ individuals, because of their minority status, are more vulnerable to and have a higher prevalence of mental illness than heterosexual individuals. In response to a dearth of cross-cultural empirical literature on this subject, the present study first explored the relationships among sense of belonging, depression symptoms, sexual identity, and gender in an Indian sample (N = 227). Next, we tested a model derived from minority stress theory in which perceived impact of Section 377 increases depressive symptoms of sexual minorities by increasing concealment stress, leading to a diminished sense of belonging. Analyses revealed significant differences in impact, sense of belonging, and depression symptoms between straight and sexual minority participants, and path analysis showed a good fit of the data to a revised model of minority stress, as influenced by antisodomy legislation. Thus, the present study provides preliminary support for the effect that this legislation may have on those targeted and points to a need for increased mental health and social support for sexual minorities in India.