2009
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffp012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaphora and Semantic Innocence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us start by examining the Deixis Hypothesis. On this view, the pronoun “he” of (28), rather than being anaphoric on “Bill,” operates as a deictic particle whose value, the individual Bill, is determined relative to a referent raised to salience by the in‐quote NP “Bill.” Smit and Steglich‐Petersen () object that embracing this line of thinking would force one to uphold that even the pronoun occurring in (32) is deictic, which, they argue, is problematic.…”
Section: Coreference By Deixismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Let us start by examining the Deixis Hypothesis. On this view, the pronoun “he” of (28), rather than being anaphoric on “Bill,” operates as a deictic particle whose value, the individual Bill, is determined relative to a referent raised to salience by the in‐quote NP “Bill.” Smit and Steglich‐Petersen () object that embracing this line of thinking would force one to uphold that even the pronoun occurring in (32) is deictic, which, they argue, is problematic.…”
Section: Coreference By Deixismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument, a version of which is endorsed by Smit and Steglich-Petersen (2010), generates a strong case against R-Inheritance. Notice that the issue appears bound to surface no matter what specific approach to the nature of unbound anaphora one chooses to adopt.…”
Section: (6)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such responses require establishing correspondences between nouns (and pronouns), possibly separated by long spans of text. Anaphoric resolution (establishing correspondence among nouns and pronouns that refer to the same entity within and across sentences) is difficult, hence we acknowledge the possibility of overestimation in this process (31,32). Our analysis relies upon counting words from our dictionary of relationship terms.…”
Section: A Caveat On Anaphora and Overestimationmentioning
confidence: 99%