2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2019.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaphylaxis at school. Are we prepared? Could we improve?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the presentation students knew signi cantly more about anaphylactic shock ( Table 1, Table 2) and each trainee obtained the minimum of 50% score after the training. These results correspond with other studies, in which respondents also obtained very good results after receiving training in the management of food allergy and anaphylaxis [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After the presentation students knew signi cantly more about anaphylactic shock ( Table 1, Table 2) and each trainee obtained the minimum of 50% score after the training. These results correspond with other studies, in which respondents also obtained very good results after receiving training in the management of food allergy and anaphylaxis [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…indicates that the program is e cient and it emphasizes the need for training. Similar results were observed in other studies [15,16]. All respondents correctly answered at least 50% of the test questions after the training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results correspond with other studies, in which respondents also obtained very good results after receiving training in the management of food allergy and anaphylaxis. In every case, knowledge improved after a simple training [7,[29][30][31]. Conducted research has also proved that specific multidisciplinary training increases self-efficacy [30] and confidence [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%