2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anastomotic leakage as a risk factor for the long-term outcome after curative resection of colon cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
70
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
70
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate is within the range of literature-reported clinical situations in patients [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and could be reduced significantly by a circumferential extraluminal experimental fibrin sealant to the site of the circular anastomosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This rate is within the range of literature-reported clinical situations in patients [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and could be reduced significantly by a circumferential extraluminal experimental fibrin sealant to the site of the circular anastomosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In this respect, Flodeen [29] analyzed 45 patients with EAL and LAL after LAR for rectal cancer. In this trial, 60 % (n=27) of symptomatic leakage was diagnosed during the initial hospital stay on median of eight postoperative days (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). However, 40 % (n=18) were diagnosed after discharge from hospital on a median of 22 postoperative days (33-172).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication after gastrointestinal surgery resulting in a significant increase in the 30-day mortality and morbidity rates. The mortality rate of this complication may be as high as 13-27% [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The reported anastomotic leakage rates are 1-39%, but a comparative evaluation of the studies is difficult due to the lack of standardized definitions [9,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that poor patient physiology is associated with an increased likelihood of post-operative complications such as an anastomotic leak; recognised to be associated with early recurrence and cancer death, independent of tumour stage (McArdle et al, 2005;Jung et al, 2008;Marra et al, 2009). Another possible explanation, examined in this study, is that a pre-operative systemic inflammatory response reflects, in part, the existence of physiological dysfunction (Roxburgh and McMillan, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%