“… 40 This study used criteria developed for a previous survey of treatment options to organize the appearance of injuries, 21 with no attempt to provide a new classification system. By their appearance, these injuries could disrupt the normal 3 layer anatomy of the labrum 42 and could affect the multiple well delineated roles of the labrum as a tension band (injuries involving the superior component with a peel back), a bumper to resist translation and provide edge stability (separation or a split), a washer to distribute loads (insubstance delamination), a deepener of the glenoid socket (flattening of the labrum), or as an attachment site for the glenohumeral ligaments (extension of the tear/split into the PIGHL), which have the common purpose of optimizing dynamic concavity/compression, 32 , 33 , 34 , 43 , 44 , 45 so any anatomic finding displaying these characteristics was considered an injury.…”