To measure the morphometric variables of the superior pubic ramus in a sub-set of an Arab population to establish a safe pubic screw xation technique.
MethodsCross sectional retrospective analysis of computed tomography (CT) pelvis images for 231 participants.The morphometric analysis included; pubic ramus axis length, insertion angles orientation, distance from the exit point to the pubic symphysis, distance from the entry point to acetabular joint surface and assessment of the narrowest pubic ramus diameter at three anatomical zones: para-symphyseal, midpubic and supra-acetabular areas. Pubic rami diameter correlation with age and sex was also analyzed.
ResultsA total of 231 participants were included (55% male, 45% female). The mean screw length was between (104-127 mm) and it is signi cantly higher in males than females. The narrowest canal diameter was found at the para symphyseal area in both sexes were; 7.35mm in males and 4.75 mm in females. In females, all canal diameters at the three measured regions were signi cantly smaller than male's diameters. The mediolateral insertion angle was signi cantly higher in females than males (49.4° vs. 41.8°, respectively), whereas the cephalic-caudal angle was signi cantly higher in males than females (49.9° vs. 42.1° respectively). The mean distance from the lateral ilium entry point to joint articular surface was higher in males (23.5 mm) than females (19.9 mm).The symphysis pubis to tubercle exit point was signi cantly higher in females than males (24.2 mm vs 16.6 mm respectively). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a statistically signi cant positive correlation between age and the pubic ramus diameter at the three measured regions in all age groups.
ConclusionThe results from this study suggest that percutaneous pubic rami screw xation using the standard 6.5 or 7.3mm cannulated screw system may potentially be unsafe in female Arab patients. Thus, a closer evaluation in this subset of patients may require the alternative solid non-cannulated screws (3.5-4.5mm) or plate xation options. Further, female patients may have a higher risk of acetabular joint penetration, while males have a potentially higher risk of pudendal nerve injury