2005
DOI: 10.1080/13651820510028828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomic segmental resection compared to major hepatectomy in the treatment of liver neoplasms

Abstract: Segmental resections were associated with less EBL and fewer postoperative complications. There was a trend towards fewer deaths in non-cirrhotic patients, and no apparent penalty for a smaller hepatic resection in long-term survival. While sometimes technically more challenging, segmental resections are preferable when feasible and should be utilized in efforts to conserve liver parenchyma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, for tumors located in the left lateral segment, a left lateral segmentectomy is relatively easier to perform than a single segment resection. 28 As a result, positive staining was not considered helpful as shown in Case 1 which included an HCC in segment S3. However, in cases in which a patient has an impaired liver function and can only tolerate a wedge resection, positive staining may be helpful in visualizing the resection line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In general, for tumors located in the left lateral segment, a left lateral segmentectomy is relatively easier to perform than a single segment resection. 28 As a result, positive staining was not considered helpful as shown in Case 1 which included an HCC in segment S3. However, in cases in which a patient has an impaired liver function and can only tolerate a wedge resection, positive staining may be helpful in visualizing the resection line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One study by Zorzi et al showed that wedge resections were comparable to anatomic resections with respect to positive surgical margins, recurrence, median survival and 5-year survival [21]. Helling et al demonstrated that if feasible, segmental resections were preferred over major anatomic resections because there were less postoperative complications and overall survival was comparable [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Segmental liver resection is preferable because it can conserve liver function and reduce postoperative complications in the treatment of liver neoplasms ( 2 , 3 ). In cases of segmental surgery, the greater the posterior liver is, the more difficult the surgery can be ( 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%