Anatomic Variation of the Median Nerve Associated with an Anomalous Muscle of the Forearm

Wei

J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj

2020

Median nerve anatomy is of great interest to clinicians and scientists given the importance of this nerve and its association with diseases. A rare anatomical variant of the median nerve in the distal forearm and wrist was discovered during a cadaveric dissection. The median nerve was deep to the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) in the carpal tunnel. It underwent a 360-degree spin before emerging at the lateral edge of FDS. The recurrent motor branch moved from medial to lateral on the deep surface of the median nerve, as it approached the distal carpal tunnel. This variant doesn't fall into any of Lanz's four groups of median nerve anomalies. We propose a fifth group that involves variations in the course of the median nerve. This report underscores the importance of recognizing variants of the median nerve anatomy in the forearm and wrist during surgical interventions, such as for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Median Nerve Variation: A Complete Spin before Terminal Branching

Wei

J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj

2020

Medicina: Atenção Às Rupturas E Permanências De Um Discurso Científico 4

“…Tal variação deve ser considerada durante procedimentos cirúrgicos nas áreas de pescoço, uma vez que esse tipo de achado indica uma posição de vulnerabilidade relativa para os componentes em questão. superfície lateral do antebraço (Atoni et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Pitiríase Liquenóide, Dermatose Incomum – Um Relato De Caso

Silva¹,

Jordão²,

Silva³

et al. 2022

Direitos para esta edição cedidos à Atena Editora pelos autores. Open access publication by Atena Editora Todo o conteúdo deste livro está licenciado sob uma Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Atribuição-Não-Comercial-NãoDerivativos 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, inclusive não representam necessariamente a posição oficial da Atena Editora. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.Todos os manuscritos foram previamente submetidos à avaliação cega pelos pares, membros do Conselho Editorial desta Editora, tendo sido aprovados para a publicação com base em critérios de neutralidade e imparcialidade acadêmica.A Atena Editora é comprometida em garantir a integridade editorial em todas as etapas do processo de publicação, evitando plágio, dados ou resultados fraudulentos e impedindo que interesses financeiros comprometam os padrões éticos da publicação. Situações suspeitas de má conduta científica serão investigadas sob o mais alto padrão de rigor acadêmico e ético.

“…Patients may have anatomical variations in the carpal tunnel and median nerve [ 25 ]. Therefore, the identification of appropriate ultrasonographic parameters is very important for the diagnosis of CTS [ 13 , 20 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Posterior Border Distance: An Effective Diagnostic Measurement for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography

Meriç

Başdelioğlu

Yanık

et al. 2020

Cureus

The purpose of this study was to define posterior border distance (PBD), which represents an ultrasonographic diagnosing method of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and to determine the reliability of PBD in comparison with electromyography (EMG) results. Methods Thirty-three patients (mean age: 51.8 ± 9.5 years; 27 females and six males) with CTS were included in this study. Ultrasonography (US) and EMG were performed under blinded conditions. PBD was evaluated by measuring the length of the perpendicular line between the posterior border of the median nerve and the line between the hook of the hamate and trapezoid tubercle. The cross-sectional area, anteroposterior (AP), and transverse diameter of the median nerve were measured. Control US was performed in 20 patients who were available at the first year postoperative follow-up and the results compared with preoperative US values. Correlation analyzes were performed to determine the relationship between electrodiagnostic results and ultrasonographic measurements. Results According to the results of preoperative and postoperative first-year US, there were statistically significant differences in the results of PBD (preoperative: 3.309±1.7472 mm, postoperative: 2.290±0.7867 mm p: 0.013) and AP diameter of the median nerve (preoperative: 3.012±0.7865 mm, postoperative: 2.680±0,5578 mm p: 0.017). There was no statistically significant difference in transverse diameter (preoperative: 6.585±1.9505 mm, postoperative: 6.955±2.2128 mm) and cross-sectional area (preoperative: 14.33±6.513 mm 2 , postoperative: 11.20±5.830 mm 2) results (p>0.05). The cutoff value of PBD was ≥3.6 mm, it yielded 81.48% specificity and 83.33% sensitivity in the diagnosis of CTS. PBD was correlated with motor and sensory latency, anteromedial, and transverse diameter of the median nerve (p<0.05). There was no correlation between EMG values and the results of the cross-sectional area, transverse diameter, and AP diameter of the median nerve (p>0.05). Conclusion PBD is suggested as a reliable ultrasonographic measurement method for the diagnosis of CTS.