2005
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical abnormalities in dopaminoceptive regions of the cerebral cortex of dopamine D1 receptor mutant mice

Abstract: Alteration of dopamine neurotransmission during development can induce specific changes in neuronal structure and function. Here, we report specific morphological and neurochemical changes of projection neurons and interneurons of the medial frontal cortex of the dopamine D(1) receptor null mouse. Using immunostaining of cytoskeletal proteins and a crossbred D(1) receptor null:YFP transgenic reporter line, we demonstrate that the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells are abnormally organized in the prefrontal an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results in D1R knockout mice appear somewhat contradictory since locomotor sensitization induced by cocaine was strongly reduced, as expected, whereas locomotor sensitization to D-amph and cocaineinduced CPP were clearly obtained in these mice (Crawford et al, 1997;Karper et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2000). This apparent discrepancy may be related to the existence of compensatory mechanisms in D1R knockout mice (Karper et al, 2002;Stanwood et al, 2005). Our results show that the partial deficiency of D1R signaling does not prevent the development and the expression of locomotor sensitization to cocaine and D-amph.…”
Section: Gaolf and Not D1r Levels Control Acute Locomotor Effects Of mentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Results in D1R knockout mice appear somewhat contradictory since locomotor sensitization induced by cocaine was strongly reduced, as expected, whereas locomotor sensitization to D-amph and cocaineinduced CPP were clearly obtained in these mice (Crawford et al, 1997;Karper et al, 2002;Xu et al, 2000). This apparent discrepancy may be related to the existence of compensatory mechanisms in D1R knockout mice (Karper et al, 2002;Stanwood et al, 2005). Our results show that the partial deficiency of D1R signaling does not prevent the development and the expression of locomotor sensitization to cocaine and D-amph.…”
Section: Gaolf and Not D1r Levels Control Acute Locomotor Effects Of mentioning
confidence: 42%
“…This suggests that D1 receptors play a role in the locomotor activating effects but not the rewarding effects of cocaine. However, as with all knockout models, these data should be interpreted with caution because of developmental abnormalities (Stanwood et al 2005). Similar to the D1 knockout mice, D2 -/-and +/-mice show a blunted locomotor response to a cocaine challenge compared to WT mice.…”
Section: Genetic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Alterations in the fetal development of the monoaminergic system can affect short-and long-term attention and cognitive development. Perhaps a point of origin for the disturbances from the effects of cocaine is the reduction of the coupling of the D1 receptor to its G protein-coupled receptor (Jones et al, 2000;Stanwood et al, 2005;Zhen et al, 2001). This uncoupling is sustained into adulthood and is specific for D1 receptors.…”
Section: Cocainementioning
confidence: 99%