2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical and frequencies-specific hearing results of retrograde mastoidectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results for the second criterion, the threshold at low frequencies had a higher prognostic value. This is in agreement with the findings of several previous studies that have shown better postoperative hearing improvement at lower frequencies than at higher frequencies 25,26 . To elaborate, the cutoff values for preoperative BC and preoperative ABG were 16.0 dB and 21.3 dB, respectively, and hearing levels higher than these values resulted in better hearing outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the results for the second criterion, the threshold at low frequencies had a higher prognostic value. This is in agreement with the findings of several previous studies that have shown better postoperative hearing improvement at lower frequencies than at higher frequencies 25,26 . To elaborate, the cutoff values for preoperative BC and preoperative ABG were 16.0 dB and 21.3 dB, respectively, and hearing levels higher than these values resulted in better hearing outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in agreement with the findings of several previous studies that have shown better postoperative hearing improvement at lower frequencies than at higher frequencies. 25,26 To elaborate, the cutoff values for preoperative BC and preoperative ABG were 16.0 dB and 21.3 dB, respectively, and hearing levels higher than these values resulted in better hearing outcomes. Regarding the TM perforation size, our results indicate that a larger perforation is associated with a better hearing outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%