2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-002-0038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical and radiological correlation of Lequesne's "false profile"

Abstract: Lequesne introduced a radiological projection, which is an oblique view of the edge of the acetabulum, to diagnose arthrosis affecting the anterior part of the joint and to measure the anterior coverage of the femoral head. In this study, we attempted to determine the anatomical correlation of his technique. Fifteen in vitro hemipelvises underwent radiography according to Lequesne's description, using metallic markers and wires to mark physical landmarks. According to geometric laws, the points used by Lequesn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the VCA angle of Lequesne had a low and nonsigniWcant correlation with the anterior acetabular coverage in the sagittal plane. This is in line with the anatomical and radiological investigation of Fabeck et al [3] demonstrating that the VCA angle does not correspond to a real anatomical structure. However, the fact that only four whole body specimens (eight hips) were available in the present study may limit this Wnding and a greater number of specimens might have rendered this correlation signiWcant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, the VCA angle of Lequesne had a low and nonsigniWcant correlation with the anterior acetabular coverage in the sagittal plane. This is in line with the anatomical and radiological investigation of Fabeck et al [3] demonstrating that the VCA angle does not correspond to a real anatomical structure. However, the fact that only four whole body specimens (eight hips) were available in the present study may limit this Wnding and a greater number of specimens might have rendered this correlation signiWcant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%