2021
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical basis of fascial plane blocks

Ki Jinn Chin,
Barbara Versyck,
Hesham Elsharkawy
et al.

Abstract: Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are regional anesthesia techniques in which the space (“plane”) between two discrete fascial layers is the target of needle insertion and injection. Analgesia is primarily achieved by local anesthetic spread to nerves traveling within this plane and adjacent tissues. This narrative review discusses key fundamental anatomical concepts relevant to FPBs, with a focus on blocks of the torso. Fascia, in this context, refers to any sheet of connective tissue that encloses or separates mus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
28
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…10,17 The reality is that we still do not fully understand how fascial anatomy interacts with local anesthetic and its subsequent migration after injection. [4][5][6][7] The longer duration of action (72 hours) 18 claimed by the manufacturer of the commercial preparation of a BLS used in this study and approved to use in dogs and cats in the United States (Nocita; Elanco) did not appear to further the benefit that the TAP block provided. This could have been due to a lack of sensitivity of our scoring system at picking up subtle signs of pain beyond 24 hours, and therefore, our BLS could have outlasted the duration of the immediate and acute postoperative pain, beyond which, prolonged local anesthetic duration did not provide any extra benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,17 The reality is that we still do not fully understand how fascial anatomy interacts with local anesthetic and its subsequent migration after injection. [4][5][6][7] The longer duration of action (72 hours) 18 claimed by the manufacturer of the commercial preparation of a BLS used in this study and approved to use in dogs and cats in the United States (Nocita; Elanco) did not appear to further the benefit that the TAP block provided. This could have been due to a lack of sensitivity of our scoring system at picking up subtle signs of pain beyond 24 hours, and therefore, our BLS could have outlasted the duration of the immediate and acute postoperative pain, beyond which, prolonged local anesthetic duration did not provide any extra benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These infiltrations, however, may behave in an unpredictable way, 4 and therefore, investigations of the interaction between the anatomy and the infiltration itself may provide a better understanding of the technique and thus increase their reliability, repeatability, and the overall success of these blocks. [5][6][7] The transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block relies on the infiltration of local anesthetic in between…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Fascial plane blocks, in general, are not capable of producing as complete and dense blockade compared to neuraxial blocks, in part due to their lack of visceral analgesic potential. 5 Neuraxial blocks, conversely, provide both somatic and visceral analgesia and are even capable of providing surgical anesthesia in some cases. 6-8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The incidence of associated observed side effects with neuraxial techniques such as intraoperative hypotension, postoperative residual motor paralysis, or urinary retention is significantly decreased in the dog, 18 making peripheral nerve blocks preferred. More recently, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks (injection of local anesthetic within a selected fascial plane to target nerves that run through that plane) are gaining popularity, [19][20][21][22][23] and a number of injection techniques are being described and successfully adapted from human anesthesia to be used in the dog. [24][25][26][27] Currently, there are no standards in veterinary anesthesia regarding ERAS protocols and locoregional anesthesia for individual surgical procedures; however, there is enough published literature and clinical information to make some informed recommendations.…”
Section: The Role Of Locoregional Anesthesia In Eras Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%