2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2012.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical relationships between Wrisberg meniscofemoral and posterior cruciate ligament's femoral insertions

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the frequency and morphometry of the Wrisberg's ligament and its relationships with the posterior cruciate ligament's femoral insertion. Study design Controlled laboratory study. Methods 24 unpaired knee pieces, 12 right and 12 left were submitted to a deep dissection of the Wrisberg and posterior cruciate ligaments. The pieces were photographed with a digital camera and ruler; the Image J software was used to measure th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following full-text review and cross-referencing, 47 studies met all criteria for inclusion and were included in the review. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] After each step of the review process, any disagreement on inclusion of a study was resolved by discussion and agreement between the two reviewers. If consensus could not be reached, then inclusion was decided by the senior author (A.C.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following full-text review and cross-referencing, 47 studies met all criteria for inclusion and were included in the review. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] After each step of the review process, any disagreement on inclusion of a study was resolved by discussion and agreement between the two reviewers. If consensus could not be reached, then inclusion was decided by the senior author (A.C.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following full-text review and cross-referencing, 47 studies met all criteria for inclusion and were included in the review. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 After each step of the review process, any disagreement on inclusion of a study was resolved by discussion and agreement between the two reviewers. If consensus could not be reached, then inclusion was decided by the senior author (A.C.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation