1982
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.2.7071361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical relationships in intracavitary irradiation demonstrated by computed tomography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As both point doses and dose rate can be calculated for the dose-limiting pelvic organs, a maximum and mean dose rate can be obtained for each organ, providing more information than a single point dose calculation alone (83). Useful information can be obtained such as cervical diameter (81,82,86,91,95,111); the thickness of the rectovaginal septum (86,89,91); uterine perforation (83,88,90,115); the location of the tandem in the uterus, uterine size and shape, uterine wall thickness (81,82,91,100,116,117); and the proximity of the tandem to the bladder and rectosigmoid (88,92,94). Dose at the periphery of the cervix can also be assessed and has correlated with local control (81,82,111).…”
Section: Contemporary Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As both point doses and dose rate can be calculated for the dose-limiting pelvic organs, a maximum and mean dose rate can be obtained for each organ, providing more information than a single point dose calculation alone (83). Useful information can be obtained such as cervical diameter (81,82,86,91,95,111); the thickness of the rectovaginal septum (86,89,91); uterine perforation (83,88,90,115); the location of the tandem in the uterus, uterine size and shape, uterine wall thickness (81,82,91,100,116,117); and the proximity of the tandem to the bladder and rectosigmoid (88,92,94). Dose at the periphery of the cervix can also be assessed and has correlated with local control (81,82,111).…”
Section: Contemporary Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of applicators without the standard metal and rectal shields has been reported with no increase in complications (71,105,162). To eliminate beamhardening artifacts, plastic and other CT-and MRI-compatible applicators have been tested with resultant improvement in the quality of the images obtained (71,86,95,96,100,105,111,162). CT-compatible applicators made of plastic and/or carbon or other low Z materials are recommended (95,96,118,(163)(164)(165)(166).…”
Section: Applicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dose sparing 4 is considered essential by many practitioners to maintain normal tissue injury at acceptable levels. Attempts to circumvent metal artifacts on CT images include the use of plastic unshielded applicators 5 and use of bone-imaging window and level settings, 2 which diminish visualization of soft-tissue organ boundaries. Also, custom-made Fletcher-Suit applicators with afterloading tungsten shields can be fabricated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to overcome the problem of streak artifact commonly encountered with standard Fletcher-Suit-Delclos applicators is to use a CT-compatible device. Yu et al [12] obtained CT images using a plastic applicator which enabled better visualization of anterior rectal and posterior bladder surfaces by avoiding artifact production commonly encountered with standard Fletcher-Suit applicators. This applicator did not have bladder or rectal shielding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for this lag has been the lack of a good CT-compatible tandem and ovoid device. The first CT-compatible applicators were made of plastic [12][13][14][15] with significantly different geometrical properties than the more commonly used Fletcher-Suit-Delclos device. At Duke University Medical Center, a CT-compatible tandem and ovoid applicator with the same geometric dimensions of a standard Fletcher-Suit-Delclos device was developed using an aluminum alloy [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%