“…In total, clitoral structures from 2432 biological females ( n ) aged 18–84 years‐old were recorded (Table 1). Four studies (Suh et al, 2003 ( n = 18); Abdulcadir et al, 2016 ( n = 15); Vaccaro et al, 2014 ( n = 20); Bowen et al, 2022 ( n = 22) were performed through MRI ( n = 87), two studies (Buisson et al, 2008 ( n = 5); Aydin et al, 2021 ( n = 108) were performed using US ( n = 113), four studies (O'Connell et al, 1998 ( n = 10); Jackson et al, 2019 ( n = 27); Kelling et al, 2020 ( n = 10); Blayney et al, 2021 ( n = 7) measured cadaveric clitoral structures ( n = 54), whereas 11 studies (Lloyd et al, 2005 ( n = 50); Basaran et al, 2008 ( n = 100); Mendiola et al, 2021 ( n = 100); Cao et al, 2015 ( n = 319); Köşüş et al, 2016 ( n = 35); Kreklau et al, 2018 ( n = 557); Gyftopoulos et al, 2019 ( n = 56); Chinkangsadan et al, 2020 ( n = 155); Ellibeş Kaya et al, 2020 ( n = 208); Agrawal et al, 2021 ( n = 400); Ekmez & Ekmez, 2021 ( n = 210) measured clitoral structures in living patients ( n = 2190). No significant difference ( p > 0.05) was observed between each clitoral structure and the experimental modality utilized.…”