2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215112001454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical variations of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve in relation to the inferior constrictor muscle: cadaveric dissection study

Abstract: The prevalence of type 3 variation of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve suggests that the nerve will not be encountered in a certain percentage of individuals as it lies under the cover of the inferior constrictor. Therefore, there is no justification for attempting to identify the nerve in all cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study reports an overall pooled EBSLN identification rate of 82%. Several studies reported similar identification rates [ 28 – 31 ], while others reported EBSLN identification rates ranging from 20% [ 32 ] to 100% [ 33 , 34 ]. This heterogeneity in EBSLN identification rates could be attributed to topographical variations of the nerve, type of study (intraoperative or cadaveric), or the technique of nerve identification used (visual identification alone or with the aid of neuromonitoring devices).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study reports an overall pooled EBSLN identification rate of 82%. Several studies reported similar identification rates [ 28 – 31 ], while others reported EBSLN identification rates ranging from 20% [ 32 ] to 100% [ 33 , 34 ]. This heterogeneity in EBSLN identification rates could be attributed to topographical variations of the nerve, type of study (intraoperative or cadaveric), or the technique of nerve identification used (visual identification alone or with the aid of neuromonitoring devices).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, 2.7% of EBSLNs were neither visually nor functionally identified. Patnaik et al [ 26 ] studied the courses of the EBSLN in relation to the inferior constrictor muscle in 29 fresh cadavers. They reported that 16% of nerve branches had Friedman’s type 3 courses and concluded that the EBSLN would not be encountered in a certain percentage of individuals since it lies under the inferior constrictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental principle of any surgery is the identification of a structure to avoid injuring it (21). Although nearly all RLNs can be visually identified, approximately 20% of the EBSLNs can not be visually identified due to their subfascial/ intramuscular course into inferior constrictor muscle, which makes it necessary to conduct a microdissection for the identification of the nerve (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%