2005
DOI: 10.1159/000086198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomically Based Modelling of the Human Skull and Jaw

Abstract: We present here an anatomically based model of the human masticatory system that provides a framework for simulating the complex chewing process. The initial motivation for creating this model was the desire to have a computational model of the human jaw that can be used to simulate the action of simple bites, and to calculate the stresses and forces on the teeth that are involved. The model created also provides a platform that can be used to investigate other features of the masticatory system. To construct … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide variation of muscle forces during jaw clenching was found within the literature (Ramos et al, 2010;Van Essen et al, 2005;Tanaka et al, 1994;Iwasaki et al, 2003). For this analysis, loads used by Van Essen et al (2005) were adopted but modified to only include the major muscles described above.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Constraints and Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variation of muscle forces during jaw clenching was found within the literature (Ramos et al, 2010;Van Essen et al, 2005;Tanaka et al, 1994;Iwasaki et al, 2003). For this analysis, loads used by Van Essen et al (2005) were adopted but modified to only include the major muscles described above.…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Constraints and Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometry (and orientation of the coordinate system) of the muscle of mastication and bone (viewed from the back to highlight all muscles) as presented invan Essen et al (2005). The black lines on top of the muscle geometries (red) represent the element boundaries of the cubic Hermite finite element discretisation used for the numerical simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a voxel volume of 1.41 9 10 À3 mm 3 , the total volumetric error decreases by 13% and 17% after the 1st and 2nd chewing cycles, respectively, and shows no decrease after the 3rd, 4th, and 5th cycles. Furthermore, a decrease in resolution results in a decrease in the average volumetric error, where refining the voxel volume from 5.79 to 0.724, 0.090, 0.0113, and 0.00141 mm 3 gives an average V (t) reduction of 40, 31, 7, and 3%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%