2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomo-radiological study of the Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings of a radiologic incidence of SSCD of 10.8% in the study population and an incidence of bilateral dehiscence of 33.3% are in agreement with previous literature which documents the radiologic incidence of SSCD between 3-12% (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and the incidence of bilateral dehiscence between 25-60% (7,18). Our observations also provide new information regarding SSCD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings of a radiologic incidence of SSCD of 10.8% in the study population and an incidence of bilateral dehiscence of 33.3% are in agreement with previous literature which documents the radiologic incidence of SSCD between 3-12% (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and the incidence of bilateral dehiscence between 25-60% (7,18). Our observations also provide new information regarding SSCD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In cadaver temporal bone specimens, the prevalence of SSCD has been reported to be 0.5%, with an additional 1.4% of specimens displaying an abnormally thin tegmen overlying the superior semicircular canal (2). The prevalence of SSCD on high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging is generally accepted to be higher than that in cadaver studies and ranges from 3-12% (3,4,5,6,7,8). These differences are attributed to limitations of HRCT imaging, including an inability to identify very thin layers of bone overlying the semicircular canal and to partial volume averaging effects (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique tends to overestimate the presence and dimension of semicircular canal dehiscence (30) (31). The prevalence of SCDS in CT scans in vivo resulted in significantly higher values that the real prevalence of bony dehiscence in dry temporal bone specimens, the former at 3.6%, the latter at 0.6% (32).…”
Section: The Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (Scds)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Autopsy series of cadaver temporal bone revealed an incidence of 0.3% in the general population without neuro-otologic deficits [12]. But among those with inner ear symptoms, the incidence may be as high as 19% in a retrospective series [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%