2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy and phylogenetic value of the mandibular and coronoid canals and their associated foramina in proboscideans (Mammalia)

Abstract: Characters associated with the mandibular canal are differently distributed amongst proboscidean lineages and provide useful information on the systematics and relationships of proboscideans. The aim of this paper is to describe the pattern of the mandibular canal and its associated foramina in proboscideans in order to fully appreciate the extent of interspecific variation of these structures within the group and to discuss its systematic and phylogenetic value. Outgroup comparison indicates that the conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In proboscideans (including the basal forms Eritherium and Phosphatherium ), the coronoid canal pierces the mesial base of the coronoid process; it extends from behind m3 to a foramen in the medial side of the ascending ramus, near the mandibular foramen (Gheerbrant 2009; Delmer 2005; Ferretti and Debruyne 2011). In Moeritherium , since the observation of Thewissen and Domning (1992), and Savage et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proboscideans (including the basal forms Eritherium and Phosphatherium ), the coronoid canal pierces the mesial base of the coronoid process; it extends from behind m3 to a foramen in the medial side of the ascending ramus, near the mandibular foramen (Gheerbrant 2009; Delmer 2005; Ferretti and Debruyne 2011). In Moeritherium , since the observation of Thewissen and Domning (1992), and Savage et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The section in Elephas corresponds to the same individual and mirror-imaged μCT slice figured by Ferretti & DeBruyne (2011: their fig. 2G) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomically important cranium and tusks for the distinction between the two genera are missing from the APL collection; however, several lines of evidence exclude an assignment to Palaeoloxodon: a) Palaeoloxodon is characterized by tight enamel folding and presence of midline sinuses; in the APL molars, the moderate enamel folding (APL-687, 716) and midline swellings (APL-687) are traits seen generally in much worn elephantid molars, and are without taxonomic significance; b) in early wear, the plates of Palaeoloxodon are typically subdivided into two short lingual and labial rings, and with a long central ring; in contrast, in all APL molars, their plates in early wear consist of sub-equal rings; c) the M3 of P. antiquus are more hypsodont (mean value HI > 1.9) than the APL one; d) the lamellae of Palaeoloxodon commonly have "cigar-shape" and blunt lingual and labial ends; in the APL molars the enamel bands run almost parallel to each other; and e) a medial mental foramen is absent in P. antiquus, whereas it is present in the APL mandible (Palombo & Ferretti 2005;Ferretti & Debruyne 2011;Lister et al 2012;Stimpson et al 2016). The APL molars are further differentiated from Elephas, which is characterized by: a) dental wear, which progresses from a row of small rings at the apex, to three subequal rings that finally fuse to form (Ferretti & Debruyne 2011;Lister et al 2013). Finally, the lozenge-shaped dental wear figure in contact in the successive lamellae in the midline, typical for Loxodonta (Maglio 1973), is not present in the APL molars.…”
Section: Discussion-comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%