1992
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92695-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomy and the medical school curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] Anatomy encompasses many aspects of the morphological basis of medicine and provides a structural framework for the development of clinical logic. [2,12] The clinical relevance of anatomy remains highly rated among medical students globally; [1,13] the same is noted in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…[1] Anatomy encompasses many aspects of the morphological basis of medicine and provides a structural framework for the development of clinical logic. [2,12] The clinical relevance of anatomy remains highly rated among medical students globally; [1,13] the same is noted in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Senior clinicians become so familiar with the basic sciences relevant to their specialities, including anatomical variations and abnormalities, that they tend to assume that such knowledge is somehow innate in anyone admitted to medical school. Even a teacher of anatomy (Monkhouse, 1992) fails to mention variation in his analysis of the state of anatomy in the 1990s. Perhaps practitioners and teachers alike consider-wrongly-that the phenomenon is so well known and understood as to be obvious.…”
Section: How Much Knowledge Of Variation?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to teaching clinical skills to preclinical students, anatomists also give revision lectures and tutorials to clinical students (Monkhouse, 1992); clinical anatomy questions set by the professor of anatomy are now included on the final medicine and surgery truelfalse multiple choice question paper. In 1992 these anatomy questions raised no alarm-indeed, students did not instantly recognize them as questions emanating from the department of anatomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%