A procedure is presented to distinguish between immature fiber neps and neps composed of thin, mature fibers in cotton lint. The procedure consists of dyeing webs, produced from lint that has been processed to produce mechanical neps, with a dye known to resist coverage of immature cotton, and identifying those neps that present a contrast in shade against the mass of dyed fiber. On the basis of the three samples used in this initial study, good correlation appears to exist between the number of undyed neps in dyed fiber webs and the number of cloth neps in the finished dyed fabric produced from that fiber.The problem of excessive neppiness in cotton fiber, which results in large numbers of apparently undyed specks in the dyed fabric, has been an area of concern to the American textile industry for more than half a century. Formed as a function of the entanglement of . 6bers during fiber preparation and yam processing, neps are known to vary in composition. Pearson has described fifteen different kinds of neps, based on the types of fibers that enter into the tangle and the presence -of foreign particles within the fiber mass [ 11 ] . Although a direct relationship is known to exist between nep formation and the proportion of thin-walled fibers in the cotton lint, thin mature fibers also have a tendency to form entanglements. While conditions of growth and 6ber cleaning and processing conditions appear to affect nep formation, fiber variety is considered especially crucial in determining nepping propensity [ 7, 8, 12]. Neps formed from thin, fully mature fibers do not appear to present a problem to the textile dyer; only those neps composed primarily of immature fibers show up as light specks on the finished fabric [ 4 J. There have been several procedures developed to evaluate the nepping potential of cotton fiber [ 1 b, 1 c, 2 ] , but there is no method currently available to distinguish between those neps composed of fully mature, thin 6btrs and those from immature fibers with poorly developed secondary walls. Although Harrison and Bargeron found reasonable correlations between micronaire, card nep counts, and yam nep count data [ 5 ] , Hughs and Lalor found that there was no consistent relationship between card nep, yarn nep, and cloth nep counts [ 7 ] . Hughs and Lalor saw dramatic differences in the number of cloth dyeing imperfections, i.e., cloth neps, in the dyed fabric produced from fibers of different varieties that had appeared to show fairly small differences in raw nep count or card web nep counts.One of these fibers produced cloth with considerably fewer ( nep ) dyeing imperfections than would have been predicted from the fiber nep counts, while a second fiber produced cloth with considerably more dye-resistant neps than would have been predicted based on the fiber nep data. These findings illustrate the limitations of fiber-level nep counts as predictors of dyeresistant neps in the finished fabric.There is a current focus on the development of finer, longer fibers that will produce high count' yar...